This was no doubt a very carefully worded poll designed to get a certain result.
Meaningless without the internals of the poll.
From PAFOA:
Here’s who funded the poll...a law firm from Minneapolis who operates all over the world who focuses on “diversity”. Their foundation focuses on grants for arts, cultural and “social” welfare.
https://www.dorsey.com/diversity
https://www.dorsey.com/locations
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/f...ea-grants.html
“This was no doubt a very carefully worded poll designed to get a certain result.”
I can only guess the wording;....To ensure the safety of woman and children, and for the safety of society in general with the promise your 2nd amendment rights won’t be trampled on without a really, really good reason, and in order to preserve your family’s well being and prevent them from being slaughtered, do you support reasonable and sensible red flag laws to remove firearms from the hands of a maniac family member?
Yes? No?
See my #58.
You are right. How the Q is worded becomes the issue almost entirely.
So the end of the article tells us that 1000 people were polled, but no mention of how the Q’s were worded.
ALL polls are worded to get the result the pollsters are looking for.