To: John Conlin
Seriously, you are comparing the standard of living of our poor to that of King George V or Queen Victoria and their related nobility? These government-subsidized poor certainly are not starving, but the kind of things available to royalty of “less than a century ago” are still way out of reach of such people.
17 posted on
08/30/2019 8:52:59 AM PDT by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: Olog-hai
but the kind of things available to royalty of less than a century ago are still way out of reach of such people. The converse is also true. The kinds of things available to the poor in America were completely out of reach of even the wealthiest of kings a century ago.
24 posted on
08/30/2019 9:00:56 AM PDT by
null and void
(Heaven has an impenetrable wall, and a welcoming gate for those qualified, Hell is wide open.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson