The underlying issue is Democrats exploiting the mentally ill.
and more victim groups to divide, support, and gather votes.
That’s exactly what’s going on.
Great post. Thanks.
...Democrats exploiting the mentally ill...
____________________________________
...in order to create yet another exploitable minority.
I find it curious that trannies vandalize women’s shelters and are in severe conflict with radical feminists.
This is not turning out like the progs thought.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
The referenced case is all about Title VII. And right off the bat, Title VII is regarded as a list of protected classes.
”[…] that in Title VII neither transgender persons nor gender identity were protected classes [??? emphasis added] […],” —R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
The major constitutional problem with protected classes is that the Founding States expressly prohibited both federal and state governments from establishing protected / privileged classes which is what Title VII effectively does imo.
"Article I, Section 9, Clause 8: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States [emphasis added]: And no person holding any office or profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state."
"Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility [emphases added]."
In fact, consider that the only sex-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect is limited to voting rights issues, evidenced by the 19th Amendment, this case clearly not dealing with voting issues.
"19th Amendment:The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
The bottom line is that R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. is defending itself against an unconstitutional federal law imo, a law made by lawless, career Democrats to “buy” the votes of low-information voters to keep themselves in power.
Also, by taking on federal cases that should otherwise be easily constitutionally resolved in a lower court, pro-LGBT activist judges and justices are wrongly abridging the 5th Amendment right to a speedy trial for everybody else in the queue imo.
"The Constitution was written to be understood by the voters; its words and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary, as distinguished from technical, meaning; where the intention is clear, there is no room for construction and no excuse for interpolation or addition.” —United States v. Sprague, 1931.
Corrections, insights welcome.
Remember in November 2020!
MAGA! Now KAG! (Keep America Great!)