Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/05/2019 6:34:43 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: familyop

You are in far more danger from you own government than you are from armed crazies.

Governments murdered 262,000,000 of their own citizens in the 20th century alone.

Armed crazies aren’t even a pimple compared to that.

If we are going to have red-flag laws, the first people to be red-flagged should be all government officials and employees and their bodyguards.

If we can save just one life it will be worth it.


2 posted on 09/05/2019 6:38:31 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

"Dave Kopel, research director at the Independence Institute, a Denver-based libertarian think tank, said states have taken the same approach President Donald Trump spoke in favor of in March 2018: “Take the guns first, go through due process second.”...

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, announced his intention last month to introduce bipartisan legislation with Democratic U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut. It would set up a grant program to assist states in adopting red flag laws.
"

Sure, without my vote.

3 posted on 09/05/2019 6:39:00 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
“We believe it’s very important that basic due process standards are considered when drafting measures like this,” he said. “It can have serious impacts on innocent individuals.”

If "basic due process standards are considered" there can never be any such thing as a "red flag" law.

The entire concept is to create a 100% bypass of due process.

This needs to absolutely be put out of business.

.

4 posted on 09/05/2019 6:41:51 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Yep and 10K worth of legal bills later


5 posted on 09/05/2019 6:44:55 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (There's a stairway to heaven, but there's a highway to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
Should a massive brutal gorilla of a man be allowed to use Red Flag laws to anonymously force the police to disarm his petite wife, who just filed for divorce because he was injuring her and her children?

Yes?
No?

Keep in mind, since the gorilla has a reasonable chance of getting shot if he tries to beat the soon to-be-ex-wife and her daughters to a bloody pulp, and he is a gorilla, it's what they do, and she is a mother grizzly and protecting her cubs is what she does.

Besides there are damned few liberal judges who won't think that a gun in a house where children live is anything but prima facia evidence of Red Flag danger.

6 posted on 09/05/2019 6:45:47 PM PDT by null and void (After those deliberate lies THEY owe it to me to be honest, I don't owe them to be less suspicious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
Red Flag laws are just blank checks for vindictive crazy people acting out on their resentment against gun owners.

How about lets just return to punishing the guilty instead of everyone else.

take away guns and they will make bombs, take away bombs and they will use fire, take away fire and they will use motor vehicles, or rocks or knives or hammers etc etc etc

7 posted on 09/05/2019 6:47:30 PM PDT by KTM rider ( .......than to post and remove all doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
But Graham, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, made sure to mention that new legislation would require “robust due process and judicial review.”

Oh good. I suppose if you have enough money or power and don’t mind a few good court fights and hearings you’ll be fine.
10 posted on 09/05/2019 6:50:42 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Debate?! What is there to debate? There is absolutely no due process with red flag laws.


11 posted on 09/05/2019 6:51:31 PM PDT by walkingdead (By the time you realize this is not worth reading, it will be too late....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

while they talk about ‘due process’.. many Americans including some good honest citizens (and good “just following orders” police officers) will be hurt or shot dead if the political hacks try to impose such patently illegal and dangerous “laws” or confiscations on American citizens

just pointing out the obvious, alas the commie political hacks probably won’t quit, tho

they don’t give a damn about American citizens or police, they only care about their own power and profits


12 posted on 09/05/2019 6:52:47 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Red flag laws and socialist libtards and cucks that want them, prove we need the 2nd Amendment now more than ever.


13 posted on 09/05/2019 6:54:03 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

The real question is when does the illusion of safety trump constitutional and God given natural rights?

Red flag laws won’t make anyone safer but it might make them less safe when people start getting very angry about losing their rights.

What idiot alive believes firearms are the only way to hurt mass numbers of people? Have they never heard of fire, gasoline, bombs, poison or other biological agents, just to name a few?


14 posted on 09/05/2019 6:56:29 PM PDT by Boomer (Our melting pot has turned into a pressure cooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
Combine this concern with what is being witnessed by companies like Walmart, CVS, Walgreens, etc telling people not to open carry.

Open carry does bother some people. Now, why is important?

IF someone in CVS sees a person carrying and let's say the person carrying had a bad day and aren't very polite.

What's to prevent someone within the store, say an employee, to call the police, or obtain the person's name and report it as a potential "red flag".

Next thing you know police are at the gun owner's home with a warrant to confiscate the gun(s) until such time as a court can determine IF they are truly a "red flag".

In San Fran they voted to call the NRA a terrorist organization.

Change one or two members on the Supreme Court, lose the White House and/or Senate and you will see other groups labeled as such.

Free Republic and all who've created accounts here could be on a red flag list.

It could all change overnight.

That's why it is important to show up at the ballot box next November.

15 posted on 09/05/2019 6:59:06 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

You dont say, shiney new toy for law enforcement... and they say cops would never abuse them...


18 posted on 09/05/2019 7:33:28 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Red Flag laws are the reason we need the 2nd Amendment.


19 posted on 09/05/2019 7:33:37 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Chivalry is not dead. It is a warriors code and only practiced by warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Wow. America is made up of 77% of idiots, democrats and Elmer Fudd morons stabbing you in the back to communists.


20 posted on 09/05/2019 7:35:54 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

“Rather than find clear and convincing evidence, [courts are] basically saying, ‘Better safe than sorry,’”

But, but, when I say “due process” it makes it sounds like I actually support the second amendment.


21 posted on 09/05/2019 7:36:26 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

“does not implicate the second amendment, as it does not restrict the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of their homes.”

If the citizen who is red flagged is not law-abiding, arrest that citizen, don’t just take the firearms. If the citizen who is red flagged is law-abiding there is no reason to take the firearms unless “responsible” comes into play, but what does “responsible” mean here?


22 posted on 09/05/2019 7:39:42 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

So the Elmer Fudds support red flag laws while the left is virtually swatting and doxing people for their political views... can we be that stupid!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3776823/posts?page=1


23 posted on 09/05/2019 7:42:06 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

To the Elmer Fudds and legislator Rinos considering this cop shiney new toy witchHunt legislation:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3776818/posts

However repressive the ruling regime is, however widespread lawlessness becomes, you never think that you, of all people, will be arrested. People tend to believe that the reckless automobile will plow into someone else, that the brick will fall on someone else’s head and that the undercover operative will come knocking on someone else’s door.


26 posted on 09/05/2019 7:54:23 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Government man: I’m here to buy back the guns we never owned with the taxes we took out of your paycheck:
Me: Due to your history of mass murders and violence, you failed my background check and you cannot be trusted with absolute power over the people.


29 posted on 09/05/2019 8:12:24 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson