It’s Ok to be against a coordinated limited retaliatory strike against Iran but saying the choice is WAR( i.e. invasion) and doing nothing is totally preposterous and simplistic.
I agree that it would be “preposterous and simplistic” under normal circumstances, but it’s foolish to ignore recent history. When was the last time the U.S. initiated a “limited retaliatory strike” that didn’t eventually turn into a military occupation? Iraq? Libya? Syria? ... Bueller? Bueller?