Hannity should certainly have mentioned that Biden would deny that he forced the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor in order to help his son Hunter. There probably were legitimate reasons for the prosecutor to be fired. However, if John Solomon and others are right about Hunter Biden's $83,000/month income from the Ukrainian company, then the Bidens should be forced to explain what made Hunter worth that kind of money. Here's one possibility: The Ukrainian company was corrupt, knew it was being investigated, and hired Biden precisely to shield themselves from the prosecutor. If so, their payoffs to Hunter paid off handsomely.
As for President Trump's much-criticized communications with the Ukrainian government, Trump had an obligation to inform the Ukrainians that the United States was no longer going to interfere with their investigations.
I often find myself getting mad at Hannity, but in the end I think he does much more good than bad.
Hannity should certainly have mentioned that Biden would deny that he forced the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor in order to help his son Hunter. There probably were legitimate reasons for the prosecutor to be fired. However, if John Solomon and others are right about Hunter Biden’s $83,000/month income from the Ukrainian company, then the Bidens should be forced to explain what made Hunter worth that kind of money. Here’s one possibility: The Ukrainian company was corrupt, knew it was being investigated, and hired Biden precisely to shield themselves from the prosecutor. If so, their payoffs to Hunter paid off handsomely.
As for President Trump’s much-criticized communications with the Ukrainian government, Trump had an obligation to inform the Ukrainians that the United States was no longer going to interfere with their investigations.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
you’re exactly right.
trump has an obligation to tell the Ukes USA would no longer interfer with their investigations.