“CBN News Political Analyst David Brody says Democrats will latch on to one part of the report which reveals that White House lawyers asked for the phone call to be moved to a classified server, and they’ll claim that’s a sign there was something wrong with the phone call.”
If the president determines a sensitive situation that needs to be to s secure line, and someone overhears the conversation, and tells anyone, that is espionage. The person that the person told that went public with it, the whistle blower, is just as guilty as he is repeating hearsay with the intention of trying to threaten the POTUS, a felony.
And another interesting matter is that members of congress further extenuated the passing of sensitive information between two leaders of their respective countries to the public and screamed and started inquiries toward impeachment. Here’s another fine mess you’ve gotten me into Nancy.
rwood
Good points.....
Here is what this Brody person says:
“”In other words, this isn’t just a whistleblower. The whistleblower came forward, but he or she is getting information from multiple people inside the White House, and also potentially at the State Department and other places. That screams ‘Deep State’ to folks that subscribe to that,” Brody said.
Whoever it was knew the ins and outs of the law, as seen by the legal structure of the written complaint. This was not a case where someone saw something and said something. This is clearly a case of someone abusing the whistleblower statute, and their inside knowledge as an intelligence officer in order to gain a political edge for the Democrats.