Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Evidence Shows Democrat Adam Schiff Likely Had “Whistleblower” Accusations a Month Ago –
GP ^ | September 27, 2019 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 09/27/2019 8:40:33 AM PDT by mplc51

On Thursday the House Intelligence Committee released the the unclassified version of the whistleblower complaint against President Trump based on hearsay of a Trump phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky in July.

On Thursday afternoon following the House Intelligence Committee hearing it was revealed the Deep State whistleblower is a CIA officer who was detailed to work at the White House, according to a report by The New York Times.

Little is known about this alleged ‘whistleblower’ but the Times reported that he has since returned to the CIA.

We also know from previous reports that the “whistleblower” has “arguable political bias – in favor of a rival political candidate.”

Following the release of the whistleblower report by the House Intelligence Committee former CIA analyst Fred Fleitz, who edited transcripts of presidential phone calls with foreign leaders, posted a series of tweets on this planned and coordinated attack on President Trump.

Fleitz points out that the whistleblower had a lot of help. Fleitz also asks if the whistleblower who based his complaint on hearsay may have gone to Democrat lawmakers before crafting his report.

Fred Fleitz penned a piece in the New York Post on Friday where he argued the “whistleblower” complaint appears to be written by a law professor.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: adamschiff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2019 8:40:33 AM PDT by mplc51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Butt, butt, butt..............that would be like unethical and all.................... Oh, schiff-4-brains.


2 posted on 09/27/2019 8:43:35 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Are we really surprised? This is how they work, obtain sensitive information and then use it a later date to hit the President.


3 posted on 09/27/2019 8:48:00 AM PDT by Destroyer Sailor (Revenge is a dish best served cold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

For all we know Schiff’s staff helped WRITE it.


4 posted on 09/27/2019 8:49:02 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

IMHO this was all a scheme/plot set up by elements of the CIA and the dimoKKKRAT party to take down President Trump. You will notice that there is no first hand information. It is all hearsay.


5 posted on 09/27/2019 8:49:22 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Worse. Soros paid lawyers.


6 posted on 09/27/2019 8:52:30 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Like DiFi with the Kavanaugh accusations? Seems like a Dem thing, huh?


7 posted on 09/27/2019 8:55:26 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

Remember Schumer said we have the intelligence and will take you down 6 ways to Sunday.....or something like that


8 posted on 09/27/2019 8:57:39 AM PDT by mplc51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials ‘have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you’
by Daniel Chaitin
| January 03, 2017 10:08 PM


9 posted on 09/27/2019 8:58:37 AM PDT by mplc51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Give him a break. He needed a month to come up with his parody.


10 posted on 09/27/2019 8:59:53 AM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Had it? He probably wrote it.


11 posted on 09/27/2019 9:00:07 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


12 posted on 09/27/2019 9:20:32 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Fox news just said that the complaint ‘was sent to an official and that that official went to the WH to read the complaint 10 days before the complaint was (missed this part)


13 posted on 09/27/2019 9:22:00 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

And likely the phone call transcript. That’s why he and Nancy jumped the gun on allegations and couldn’t be bothered to read the transcript until that night.


14 posted on 09/27/2019 9:25:14 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: mplc51

Liberals have a toxic, hare-brained cornucopia of this BS... once THIS one flops... there will be another...rinse repeat


16 posted on 09/27/2019 10:01:47 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

So what? He will continue his madness unabated. The media is in full blowtorch mode. I always laugh at anyone who says they aren’t the most powerful force in politics. Most people ingest their nonsense without thinking.


17 posted on 09/27/2019 10:04:41 AM PDT by Luke21 (Civil War Two is upon us. Defend our president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51
not only help from Schiff - check out ICIG Atkinson's statements in his letter to Jerry McGuire:
" As part of its preliminary review, the ICIG did not request access to records of the President’s July 25, 2019, call with the Ukrainian President. Based on the sensitivity of the alleged urgent concern, I directed ICIG personnel to conduct a preliminary review of the Complainant’s information. Based on the information obtained from the ICIG’s preliminary review,
I decided that access to records of the telephone call was not necessary to make my determination that the complaint relating to the urgent concern “appears credible.”
In addition, given the time consumed by the preliminary review, together with lengthy negotiations that I anticipated over access to and use of records of the telephone call, particularly for purposes of communicating a disclosure to the congressional intelligence committees,
I concluded that it would be highly unlikely for the ICIG to obtain those records within the limited remaining time allowed by the statute.

what statute? and why did Schiff let this ride almost a month until Trump was addressing the UN?

18 posted on 09/27/2019 10:05:07 AM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

When will the evidence that Shifty Schiff the Elven misfit wrote the darn thing?


19 posted on 09/27/2019 10:54:22 AM PDT by zaxtres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Schiffty’s staff probably wrote it.


20 posted on 09/27/2019 11:10:58 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson