p
Sounds like a collaborative effort between Clapper and Brennan.
The complainer admits, “I was not a direct witness to most of the events described.”
The “whistleblower” admitted he did not hear anything directly, only from others. How can he then be considered a whistleblower. More like an unreliable troublemaker.
And his “testimony” is on which the Dems are trying to base the impeachment of the president of the US?! Even in a small case, the judge would throw it out instantly because hear-say evidence is not admissible.
I wrote this response yesterday regarding someone in the media being involved in writing this report:
And here:
I believe the whistleblower laws CLEARLY STATE that one is NOT a whistleblower if his or her alleged complaint involves HEARSAY OR SECOND-HAND INFORMATION!!!
A TREATY between the United States and Ukraine, coordinated by none other than President Bill Clinton himself, ALSO CLEARLY STATES THAT THE UKRAINE MAY ASSIST THE UNITED STATES IN INVESTIGATING CRIMINAL MATTERS!!!
If a past Vice President commits EXTORTION while in office THEN BRAGS ABOUT IT ON VIDEO LATER, his crimes aren't permitted to be investigated if said VP is running for office again? I'd like someone to direct to me ANY law that states multi-million dollar crimes SHOULD NOT be investigated, especially ones where the PERPETRATOR ADMITTED TO IT ON VIDEO.
I watched Levin’s show on Sunday night, with Dan Bongino being interviewed. We believe the dossier having to do with Russia-gate is the first dossier, “Dossier 1.0”. But Bongino has evidence to prove that the same thing, practically verbatim, was in the works a few years before that, for another issue. Sorry I didn’t pay enough attention to recall the circumstances and the time. In any case, it is supposed to be covered in his newest book, “Exonerated”.
So it seems they invent evil actions and save them for a day when they’ll need to carry out a lie.
When I would put George Soros’ name in any of my comments on Breightbart News, my comments always got blocked. How ironic; Now George Soros is in their headlines and talking about his dirty money being behind the democrat’s / DC establishment’s efforts of getting rid of Trump. Here’s a reality check: the corruption in DC will never fix itself. Per our Founding Fathers, that task will require US citizen’s physical intervention.
“... admits, “I was not a direct witness to most of the events described.””
That means it is hearsay and not admissible.
Adam Schiff has dirty hands...
imo, the US gummit has no business funding politically active organizations like this. this is funding our enemies efforts.
imo, the tax deductibility to these resistance groups
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Every page of the OCCRP website features the same bottom section listing the icons of four of the organization’s top funders, including Soros’s Open Society Foundations and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Indeed, OCCRP provides a hyperlink to the webpage for Soros’s Open Society at the bottom left corner of every page on OCCRP’s own website.
Soros’s Open Society was listed as the number two donor in most of the annual financial records posted on OCCRP’s website starting in 2012. Some years list Soros as the organization’s top donor.
OCCRP advertises its other funders, including Google, the National Endowment for Democracy, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the U.S. State Department Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.
Herr SSoro$ is a Nazi collaborator and we need to deport him.