Why do we need so many inspectors general? There is Horowitz, and that should be enough.
Why do we need so many inspectors general? There is Horowitz, and that should be enough.
************************************************
This one is Obama’s appointed IG for the State Department. Horowitz is the IG for DOJ.
Don’t know if you remember but a few years ago, there was an IG report from the GSA (General Services Agency) showing a guy sitting in a hot tub, “toasting” himself, sporting a martini glass, at a GSA“conference” in Las Vegas!
Thanks to some kind soul for snapping that jerk or the public would never be the wiser at the kind of “conferences” so necessary to the GSA in Las Vegas in January!
I think the IG usage may forestall having to go through another Special Prosecutor appointment? Possibly we would need a couple of dozen SPs to cover the corrupt perps. Trump probably doesn’t need the distraction and has other goose chases scheduled for the ravenous media to race after. Hee!
He’s only DOJ. Every department has its own IG.
No, Horowitz is not enough. A good, honest IG, especially at State, can scare the s... out of employees and keep them honest. Just FYI:
State Department Lacked Top Watchdog During Hillary ...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/state-department-lacked-top-watchdog-during-hillary-clinton-tenure-1427239813
Mar 24, 2015 ... The State Department had no permanent inspector general during Hillary Clinton’s entire tenure as secretary, leaving in place an acting ...
Every organization has an IG. It’s too bad that most of them are in some libs pocket.
Each agency has one, at least. Given the amount of corruption that has been uncovered over the last 3 years, I’m thinking there should be double the amount we have now. However, that only goes as far as they are impartial to what is going on and don’t let things slide based on their political leanings.
But, given the fact that a lot of them still seem to be Soetero appointees, I don’t trust their work, especially Horowitz. When McCabe and the others were caught lying his terminology was they were “less then candid”. If you and I had been questioned in the same way and were found to be “less than candid”, they would say we were, LYING. And then we’d not only be guilty of lying to a federal investigator, we could also catch a Perjury charge if we had testified before Congress and gave different information.
So, for now, Horowitz isn’t any better than the rest of them. I’m thinking their lies, corruption and malice is so deep, he may not have a choice but to out them all. When any investigation is done, all the investigator is doing is compiling statements, gathering and entering evidence, cataloguing it and making in chronological, and then passing it off to the DAs office or DOJ, who then presents everything to the people so they can decide. Neither the investigator or US Attorney decides your guilt, unless your Comey and you make the unilateral decision to give clinton a pass and destroy evidence.