Posted on 10/02/2019 9:03:51 AM PDT by rktman
In the midst of rightfully calling out President Trump for some of his overheated rhetoric reacting to the Democrats impeachment inquiry, on Tuesday, MSNBC immediately undermined its criticism by engaging its own extreme rhetoric and suggesting that heavily armed Trump supporters would march on Washington to protect their president.
President Trump ratcheting up his rhetoric as he tries to derail the push for impeachment proceedings. On Twitter, hes quoted a top supporter who said impeachment could create a, quote, Civil War-like fracture, anchor Craig Melvin warned in the 11:00 a.m. ET hour. Turning to Washington Post political reporter Eugene Scott, Melvin worried about trends in the Presidents rhetoric.
Rather than try to calm down the conversation, Scott instead claimed that Trump made a habit of threatening an uprising:
Well, Craig, we noticed that this was not the first time the President had suggested that if things do not go the way he likes, if he is not allowed to govern or lead as he sees fit, that there could be an uprising. And his words infer that it could be led by his supporters. And theres been some concern about that because this has been interpreted as perhaps the President affirming or encouraging those who feel victimized and disrespected to rise up and act out and push back, even if violently, by any means necessary to protest what they believe is unjust.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
I’d be happy to bring a load of food to feed Trump supporters for free. Where can I buy a semi load of MRE’s. Who is bring the TP?
This has gone way beyond President Trump.
These asshats just couldn't help themselves. It is obvious that they believe they will face no repercussions due to the fact that they've gotten away with all of their BS up to now.
Once this has gotten to a certain point, there will be no going back, no “I'm Sorry”’s will be accepted, and no amount of begging for forgiveness will matter.
“Germany fears heavily armed Allied forces storming the beaches of France.”
I think of it that way.
I saw a thread here that said something like, “for a war to happen, both sides have to fight.
But DC has gun laws. How will they come in?
It is possible depending on how successful a coup attempt is by the Deep State.
Rope and piano wire, too.
Someone suggested a 10 million man march and 1 million beater cars left behind to gridlock DC. Maybe we try that first?
If the demonstration were large enough police would be beside the point. Did the people storming the Bastille worry about the gendarmes?
Hmm...OK, all of us.
The East German Deep State (Stasi) came to an end when the people overran their headquarters, seized the records and made them available for all to see.
Just sayin’.
Oderint dum metuant
If Trump supporters, while heavily armed, were invading DC, that would be illegal.
Trump supporters have a vested interest in behaving in a legal and legitimate manner.
Hey, if the idea of it keeps those lefties awake at night, I don’t see the downside...
Not a bad idea.
Id also suggest we print up 10M signs to carry that read simply: Next Time We Come Armed
The primary reason for the second amendment was to prevent the government from becoming tyrannical. And, nothing could be more tyrannical than using impeachment as a means of overturning election results.
Seems like a pretty reasonable fear.
+1
Something tells me many people will have extras
March on Washington? What kind of tactic is that?
If a shooting war starts, msm types should be aware of sniper fire.
I wouldnt go armed, but I might go there.
***************
We’ll be heavily armed with and principles, convictions and patriotism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.