Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ameribbean expat

No wonder Amber was wound so tight coming home in that neighborhood. Who wouldn’t be? Especially a small female cop just getting off shift.

I personally think she screwed up but for there to be a crime I thought their had to be intent to commit a crime so she was screwed by the court system. I could see some kind of punishment and a reprimand in her police file but then again she wasn’t on duty at the time. Just a bad thing all around.


13 posted on 10/05/2019 6:10:51 PM PDT by Boomer (Our melting pot has turned into a pressure cooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boomer
I thought their had to be intent to commit a crime

When your actions are reckless, or devoid of concern for others that is sufficient to establish criminality.

Sadly Ms. Guyger's actions, regardless of her motivations, were utterly reckless. Shooting somebody sitting on their sofa because you went into their apartment thinking it was yours is definitely an example of an action which in and of itself establishes criminality.

18 posted on 10/05/2019 6:20:00 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Second Degree murder only requires that your actions were without regard to the consequences. She may not have planned to shoot the person she did, but she should have been aware that getting off at the wrong floor, going to an apartment that her key did not fit and that a welcome mat that was not hers should have led her to a proper conclusion that she was not at her apartment.

However, she disregarded all that and shot a man anyway.


24 posted on 10/05/2019 6:49:03 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Drugs can do anything


28 posted on 10/05/2019 6:53:45 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

No there doesn’t need to be intent. Ever hear of negligent homicide? Manslaughter? Neither has intent, unless something worse gets pleaded down somehow.
She screwed the pooch big time. Shot first, asked questions later, may have tried to cover it up. She’s guilty as far as I am concerned.


39 posted on 10/05/2019 7:26:12 PM PDT by vpintheak (Stop making stupid people famous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer
I personally think she screwed up but for there to be a crime I thought their had to be intent to commit a crime so she was screwed by the court system.

She stated, on the stand, under oath, that she intended to kill whoever it was inside her apartment before she opened the door. I've carried every day for the past 19 years, and I can assure you, that is not a responsible mindset in that situation.
59 posted on 10/06/2019 5:04:38 AM PDT by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson