“There is no evidence that Biden advocated for the prosecutor’s removal as a means of protecting his son.”
Except for the video where Biden explicitly admits it.
>> “There is no evidence that Biden advocated for the prosecutor’s removal as a means of protecting his son.”
> Except for the video where Biden explicitly admits it.
Watch the weasel wording. There’s no evidence that the reason he advocated for the prosecutor’s removal was as a means of protecting his son. Obvious conflict of interest, yes. Hard, cold evidence... well, that’s what Trump wanted the Ukrainians to see if they could find.
He did everything but mention his son.
“Well, you see it is a very complicated issue that not everyone can clearly understand, only people who have spent years reading reports from respected sources and studying the issue can understand it”
/libs