How the Hobbs Act Could Sink Joe Biden: Legally speaking, Slow Joe is all but sunk on Ukraine

To say the drive-by media have circled the wagons for Joe Biden is putting it mildly. Every day, in print and on their TV broadcasts, they thunder that there is no evidence! He broke no laws when his son raked off millions of dollars from China and Ukraine for no-show jobs. Even New Jersey's most famous traffic judge seems to be confused. A guy in Ukraine also posits that Biden broke no laws there, either, as if there were really any laws to break in that wild West corruption show.

But as an American lawyer, who often has to advise public officials on state and federal ethics laws, I can say yes, just by the public record we already have, Joe Biden, his son, their bag-man Devon Archer, and possibly John Kerry likely violated 18 USC 1951, the dreaded Hobbs Act, the federal anti-extortion law. Hobbs has a really nasty bite to it for public officials, because it prohibits not just bribery, but merely the collecting of political tribute under color of official right.

A couple of important things to remember about Hobbs: "Color of official right" applies only to public officials while they are in office. This guy, for example, is very confused, mixing up Jeb Bush's sleazy fundraising while out of office with Hillary's activities in and out of office. It would apply to Hillary, for example, only during the time she was secretary of state. Also, the illegal payoff money can go to a close relative or associate, or even a charity, if there is enough of a connection to the accused, like the Clinton Foundation scam. Anybody assisting the public official in the pay-offs would also be guilty of conspiracy, at the very least.

A week and a half ago I predicted that Joe would be gone within 21 days. We are now at day 10. Now Joe is trying to twist and turn to get out of the grasp of the facts now known by the electorate.

Its futile. One of his radical compatriots will put nails in his coffin.Wait for it....sweet when in happens.

***I certainly do not think it's a coincidence that she reemerged at the same time the whistleblower scam hit***

It occurs to me that the kangaroo court arrangement that Adam Schiff has imposed - secret witnesses, secret hearings, no presidential participation, no Repub participation, Dem control over release of info on progress - is reminiscent of the way that Hillary wanted to run the Watergate impeachment committee . . . she was fired back then...

Could HRC still be orchestrating the coup?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.