Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana

Never mind the spoilers, you’re missing the point.
The movie is FICTION— as are most movies.
Prosecutors want to introduce scenes from a freakin’ movie to the jury-— as if it’s some kind of EVIDENCE against Roger Stone?!?

It’s nothing of the kind. It’s an attempt to smear, to assassinate his— and by extension, Trump’s— character

The judge should have tossed the lawyers in jail and probably could have tossed the whole case. A stunt like that is abuse of process.


13 posted on 10/21/2019 12:04:55 PM PDT by mumblypeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mumblypeg
Never mind the spoilers, you’re missing the point.

I was being silly. I didn't really mean the clip of a movie shouldn't be shown in court to not spoil the ending for the jurors. I was mocking the idea of showing the movie in court at all. If I have to be explicit, it kind of takes the fun out of it.

I have no love for Roger Stone, but the man is NOT GUILTY of the charges.
14 posted on 10/21/2019 12:09:14 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (Sutor, ne ultra crepidam--Appelles of Kos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson