.
Posted on 10/23/2019 5:10:36 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
WASHINGTON—Judicial Watch made public on Oct. 21 a 2012 email chain showing multiple senior U.S. State Department executives used then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private email to discuss the most sensitive details of the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, died in the assault, which within hours was attributed by the Obama White House to an internet video that critically portrayed Islam and its founder, Mohammed.
While Judicial Watch first sought the emails released on Oct. 21 in a 2014 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, they weren’t released to the nonprofit government watchdog until earlier in October by a federal court and only after the group threatened to expand its litigation in the case against the State Department.
It was this FOIA litigation that led to the public disclosure of Clinton’s use of the private email system, according to Judicial Watch.
Hundreds of other State Department and White House documents sought in the 2014 suit were previously released, but only after years of litigation and discovery, which continues and may soon include deposing Clinton and Cheryl Mills, her former chief of staff.
U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, who has heard much of the Judicial Watch litigation seeking the documents, has called Clinton’s private email system “one of the gravest modern offenses against government transparency.”
The first email in the long chain, dated Sept. 29, 2012, was from Jacob Sullivan, Clinton’s then-senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, to Clinton and copied to Mills.
The email was also forwarded to Philippe Reines, who was Clinton’s then-deputy assistant secretary of state for communications. The occasion for Sullivan’s email was Clinton’s need for Benghazi information to use in a forthcoming telephone call to an unidentified U.S. senator.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
PING!
How about pre Benghazi emails that allowed the terrorists to know what was happening and when?
How about that Hillary armed these same terrorists so they could depose Ghadaffi? Then they turned on us.
“What difference, at this point, does it make?” Some video about moose limbs or something................... Hey hildabeast———Fah Q
BINGO. And Hillary REJECTING Christopher Stevens' requests for ADDITIONAL SECURITY aimed at SETTING HIM UP TO BE KIDNAPPED so Mohammad Morsi could USE STEVENS IN TRADE in order to get Obama to RELEASE THE BLIND SHEIK!!!
It’s only been over seven years since the attack at Benghazi and Soros has everyone arguing about transparency.
It will be the year 3000 before anybody really looks at the criminal activities of Obama and Hillary in Libya.
Screw every Democrat for ruining our legal system.
Time to interview the 28 or so rescued staffers who signed silence agreements.
Benghazi was about a swap for the Blind Sheikh..two weeks prior the State Department was asked about the Sheikh being released and they had “No comment” two weeks later Benghazi happened. I believe what took place was an inside attempt to get Stevens kidnapped and he would be swapped for the Sheikh, but something went wrong and Obama and his minions said screw it let them all die
I will self moderate what I feel. Nothing good will come with my true feelings.
Arms deal, stevens knew too much.
.
Read the report. The Libyan news media released that the ambassador was there. In fact he was there in preparation for Hillary to take a victory lap in November for overthrowing Kadaffi. The irony? Pro Kadaffi factions got the Americans out of Libya. From the transport to Tripoli to the flight out of Libya!!!
For a variety of reasons, all of them having to do with high ranking foreign government officials stealing money, the government of Libya was overthrown and the leader of Libya murdered by having a bayonet shoved up his behind.
In seven years, we can’t get beyond the fact that Hillary was using a computer.
The gun running operation was just a small part of the illegal activities in Libya.
Do you think Soros and Obama and Hillary would fight this hard for this long when all they would have to say to clear themselves of the gunnrunning was,
“We did it to encourage freedom.”?
They would not fight this hard for this long over a little gun running.
It’s way bigger than gun running.
"It knows how to energize and rile up its viewers," Rice said of Fox. "Making them angry is how they get ratings. And the way to make them angry is to create villains that they can target and vilify. And you always need fresh villains." Rice had given the network the “wherewithal” to be villainized, she mused.
“Because I had given them five different sets of video on these shows," she said. "And they could loop them, and they could turn me into a new villain." “Now on Fox, many years later, they just need to say my name and it’s like people start twitching it’s like an automatic trigger point.”
Rice has a memoir out in which she claims she was just repeating the talking points provided to her by the CIA.
==============================================
There's no cure for the depth of stupidity these people have.
AND THIS---Hillary and Obama speak at ceremony-----the arrival of Benghazi murder victims.
Two frickin' liars ---- the phony act they put on was Academy-worthy.
Hillary knew her wanton political ambitions were going up in flames. She had to think up an excuse----fast.
Bill told her to blame it on Republicans.
assuming Rice was correct about the CIA she should have resigned when she found out how she had been used. Instead she accepted a promotion for her dirty work.
Obama, Brennan, Hillary
As we all KNOW, corrupt treason.
She was stupidly angling for the SoS job to be available when Hilary got (cough) elected. ....but had to withdraw her name when the talk show lies exploded.
She was used bigtime-——no president sends out his putative SoS to lie on five TV networks.
You mean the unsecured server nobody knew about even though everyone knew about it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.