Replies

At one time that was true, but one of the rotten fruits of feminism has been to narrow the gap. Last reliable info which I read on the topic said that 80% of women and 70% of men were faithfully monogamous to their partner. That's among heterosexuals. The respective numbers for homosexuals are about 8% for Lesbians and 3% for Sodomites.

Despite all the propaganda from the Left, they aren't as normal as we are. Thus the big propaganda push to make us as promiscuous as they are.

I was always brought up to believe that females are instinctively more moral than males. Even if that was true at one time one must ask if it's true today.

Leaving moral and religious teachings out of it, the evolutionary biologists have always had a pretty compelling argument on this point. From a reproductive standpoint, men are capable of, and in "selfish gene" terms benefit from, sowing their seed widely, fathering as many children with as many different women as possible. Women, on the other hand, conceive and bear children (at some personal risk and great physical burden on themselves), and become the natural caregivers for a considerable number of years after birth.

Traditional moral teachings and social norms attempted to control the socially destructive consequences of this asymmetry by inducing men to discipline their tendency towards promiscuity and commit to a family. The quid pro quo was female chastity, to reassure men that the children they were raising would usually be their own.

One can argue over which sex made the greater sacrifice in this grand bargain. In general, however, it seems clear from historical examples that women and children are the great losers in highly promiscuous societies. But that's along story for another day.

The sexual revolutionaries now believe that, with contraception, the abortion license and government welfare guaranties to replace a husband's income, promiscuity can be made safe for women. This is not working out well, but it's the sex positive theory and they're sticking to it.

When I was a student, teachers used to contrast Brave New World and 1984 and ask whether Huxley or Orwell was the better prophet. It is now clear, however, that the left regards both books as guides, with the aim of forging a synthesis: political and news media arrangements per Orwell, and social/sexual norms per Huxley. I don't think the left will ultimately succeed because both dystopian visions are fundamentally opposed to inherent human nature. But there have been a lot of casualties, measured in aborted babies and blighted lives, and there will be millions more to come, as our corrupted society rediscovers reality.

“I was always brought up to believe that females are instinctively more moral than males”

Lol, NO. Women are just masters of discretion when it comes to sex. They have booty calls and friends with benefits but keep it discrete.

Also look what women wear versus men. Most women, well majority anyway have no problem with gays or gay marriage. I could go on and on.

Um, I’m probably going to get flamed for my thoughts...

I believe it’s the male is was/is a bit more moral. In that once understanding the true sentence of not being moral, he will be/is willing to take the stand.

Women, however, are a relationship/emotion driven species.

This is why they will often kill to protect their young, and AT THE SAME TIME so many are willing to put their own young at risk to have a life with a male.

It truly is part of the Lord’s plan. Hence, His giving the law to the male of the species yet ensuring the continuing propagation of mankind despite the pain endured by the woman during delivery.

That’s why the male had to be driven from the home by the Liberals in this country. The Black Family syndrome (if there is another name, let me know) is where a generation of black women voluntarily threw the black male out of the house for what they perceived as steady care by the Government.

The white race followed, though it took about a decade to get it rolling with them and almost 3 decades for whites in general to accept welfare and no fathers in families.

While there were fathers not providing for their families, over all there were millions who did provide and they still were told to leave the home. Then the male offspring had no leadership within the home and the female offspring had to guidance or protection.

So, yes, I believe it’s the male of the species who are the more moral.

Are there boys/men who want to dip their stick in every honey pot? Sure. I think, though, like in high school, more are not doing it while the ones doing it are getting more action and talking trash even more.

Unfortunately, more and more women feel it’s okay to have bastard offspring (no, I am not talking about incest/abusive sex/rape).

Nothing is in a vacuum.