Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans question why Schiff is running impeachment
Washington Examiner ^ | November 02, 2019 12:00 AM | Susan Ferrechio

Posted on 11/02/2019 3:48:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Under normal circumstances, the House Intelligence Committee would not have jurisdiction over the string of witnesses who have filed into the impeachment proceedings in the Capitol basement or the subject matter they are talking about.

None of the material is classified, and those who have appeared before the panel are mostly diplomats whose testimony about a July 25 phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would more suitably be scrutinized by the House Foreign Affairs Committee or the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Both the Foreign Affairs and Oversight panels have been invited to participate in the closed-door meetings, but it is Schiff and the Intelligence Committee staff Democrats who run the proceedings and who will write the final report that will determine whether the House votes on articles of impeachment.

Republicans say the mismatch raises questions about how Democrats are proceeding with the impeachment process and why Schiff, and Intelligence, was chosen to run it.

“There is absolutely nothing whatsoever in the whistleblower complaint that has any kind of intelligence component at all,” a top GOP aide told the Washington Examiner. “A presidential phone call with a foreign leader is not an intelligence matter.”

The whistleblower complaint shifted the impeachment proceedings to the control of Schiff and away from the Judiciary Committee and Chairman Jerry Nadler who had declared he was running impeachment proceedings without the blessing of Pelosi.

While the Judiciary Committee has traditionally handled the impeachment process and has held those hearings in public, Nadler had run afoul of Pelosi over his handling of the investigation and his decision to hold a series of highly partisan public hearings that were criticized by both parties.

Republicans believe Democratic leaders were looking for a way to transfer control to Schiff...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attainder; billofattainder; coup; shampeachment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2019 3:48:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The only “Republicans” questioning anything about our domestic enemies these days are anti-American never Trump Hussein Heads.


2 posted on 11/02/2019 3:50:55 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ah because he wrote the script ?


3 posted on 11/02/2019 3:54:15 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If you are going to stage a Stalinist kangaroo court who better to preside than Commissar Schiff?


4 posted on 11/02/2019 4:07:23 PM PDT by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

All three previous impeachment inquiries were under the auspices of the Judicial Committee.


5 posted on 11/02/2019 4:09:45 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The real question is why is the House Intelligence Committee (I’m giving them a break assuming there is some intelligence in it) running it and not the Judiciary Committee?


6 posted on 11/02/2019 4:11:28 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

bttt


7 posted on 11/02/2019 4:11:43 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I would imagine it’s to keep it out of the public eye since it is a committee that is essentially “eyes only” and accessible to fewer people.


8 posted on 11/02/2019 4:11:45 PM PDT by thescourged1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because he knows the jig is up and the fat lady's about to sing the democrat's final song.

Oh, and nice try to shield Obama and Pantsuit from justice, Adam. It didn't work.

9 posted on 11/02/2019 4:13:50 PM PDT by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Fighting vicious Chicago mobsters was nothing compared to dealing with certain members of Congress!"
~David Schippers~
Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton's Impeachment. Regnery Publishing, Inc., An Eagle Publishing Company, September 2000

10 posted on 11/02/2019 4:14:05 PM PDT by Savage Beast (TRUTH, as clearly as we can perceive it and put it into words, is the best we can do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

Geez


11 posted on 11/02/2019 4:23:48 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Nadler blew his chance.


12 posted on 11/02/2019 4:24:17 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I saw a theory on this last week: Schiff-heads committee is the only one authorized to have closed door hearings under the auspices of 'National Security'.

If it were to be assigned to the Judiciary, that opportunity would be lost.

13 posted on 11/02/2019 4:29:27 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Youth, speed and energy can always be overcome with experience and treachery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I seriously hope Republicans are recording these hearings.


14 posted on 11/02/2019 4:30:26 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Democrats are worse than Communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale
If you are going to stage a Stalinist kangaroo court who better to preside than Commissar Schiff?

Pelosi: "We're gonna need to find someone corrupt, biased, immoral, insincere,dishonest and totally without scruples or inhibition."

Schiff: (running up to her out of breath) "You called?"

Pelosi: "Gotta love Central Casting."

15 posted on 11/02/2019 4:35:08 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud & harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media nepws censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The book “The Plot against the president “ by Lee Smith answers this. I’m not done reading it but, the book brings clarity to a lot of things that didn’t make sense.


16 posted on 11/02/2019 4:44:47 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Remove his security clearance...


17 posted on 11/02/2019 4:46:14 PM PDT by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Because Schiff is the biggest tool in a shed full of tools?


18 posted on 11/02/2019 4:57:31 PM PDT by Natty Bumppo@frontier.net (We are the dangerous ones, who stand between all we love and a more dangerous world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Because every public hearing that Fatboy Nadler has held has turned into a sh*tshow for the Dems.

That, and Lil’ Schitt is the one who wrote this script, cast the actors and called in the costume dept.


19 posted on 11/02/2019 5:01:59 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Simple answer?

Because Democrats can have whatever they want.

And Republicans can never have anything they want.

20 posted on 11/02/2019 5:04:08 PM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson