Skip to comments.
Republicans question why Schiff is running impeachment
Washington Examiner ^
| November 02, 2019 12:00 AM
| Susan Ferrechio
Posted on 11/02/2019 3:48:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The only “Republicans” questioning anything about our domestic enemies these days are anti-American never Trump Hussein Heads.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ah because he wrote the script ?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If you are going to stage a Stalinist kangaroo court who better to preside than Commissar Schiff?
4
posted on
11/02/2019 4:07:23 PM PDT
by
allendale
(.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
All three previous impeachment inquiries were under the auspices of the Judicial Committee.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The real question is why is the House Intelligence Committee (I’m giving them a break assuming there is some intelligence in it) running it and not the Judiciary Committee?
To: butlerweave
7
posted on
11/02/2019 4:11:43 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I would imagine it’s to keep it out of the public eye since it is a committee that is essentially “eyes only” and accessible to fewer people.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because he knows the jig is up and the fat lady's about to sing the democrat's final song.
Oh, and nice try to shield Obama and Pantsuit from justice, Adam. It didn't work.
9
posted on
11/02/2019 4:13:50 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(My tagline ran off with another man.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Fighting vicious Chicago mobsters was nothing compared to dealing with certain members of Congress!"
~David Schippers~
Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton's Impeachment. Regnery Publishing, Inc., An Eagle Publishing Company, September 2000
10
posted on
11/02/2019 4:14:05 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(TRUTH, as clearly as we can perceive it and put it into words, is the best we can do.)
To: treetopsandroofs
To: allendale
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I saw a theory on this last week: Schiff-heads committee is the only one authorized to have closed door hearings under the auspices of 'National Security'.
If it were to be assigned to the Judiciary, that opportunity would be lost.
13
posted on
11/02/2019 4:29:27 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(Youth, speed and energy can always be overcome with experience and treachery.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I seriously hope Republicans are recording these hearings.
14
posted on
11/02/2019 4:30:26 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(Democrats are worse than Communists)
To: allendale
If you are going to stage a Stalinist kangaroo court who better to preside than Commissar Schiff? Pelosi: "We're gonna need to find someone corrupt, biased, immoral, insincere,dishonest and totally without scruples or inhibition."
Schiff: (running up to her out of breath) "You called?"
Pelosi: "Gotta love Central Casting."
15
posted on
11/02/2019 4:35:08 PM PDT
by
frank ballenger
(End vote fraud & harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media nepws censorship or we are finished.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The book The Plot against the president by Lee Smith answers this. Im not done reading it but, the book brings clarity to a lot of things that didnt make sense.
16
posted on
11/02/2019 4:44:47 PM PDT
by
Linda Frances
(Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Remove his security clearance...
17
posted on
11/02/2019 4:46:14 PM PDT
by
fuente
(Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because Schiff is the biggest tool in a shed full of tools?
18
posted on
11/02/2019 4:57:31 PM PDT
by
Natty Bumppo@frontier.net
(We are the dangerous ones, who stand between all we love and a more dangerous world.)
To: antidemoncrat
Because every public hearing that Fatboy Nadler has held has turned into a sh*tshow for the Dems.
That, and Lil’ Schitt is the one who wrote this script, cast the actors and called in the costume dept.
19
posted on
11/02/2019 5:01:59 PM PDT
by
digger48
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Simple answer?
Because Democrats can have whatever they want.
And Republicans can never have anything they want.
20
posted on
11/02/2019 5:04:08 PM PDT
by
daler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson