The curious timeline for taking down Trump

The Hill ^ | November 8,2019 | BY SHARYL ATTKISSON,

[tired&retired]

My thoughts exactly.

[stylin19a]

starts in Aug 2016 ? cripes...course they did say “oversimplified”...so no reason to go back to chalupa in 2015, whispering that Trump has Russian ties...

[Political Junkie Too]

If they do plan to continue this in Trump's next term, they will have to start over.

All current business will be considered concluded once the Congress adjourns sine die.

-PJ

[Verginius Rufus]

By pursuing impeachment in such a blatantly partisan fashion, the Democrats may be creating another Wellstone memorial fiasco for themselves. They can vote articles of impeachment but after such a ludicrously flawed process, what credibility will it have? In the Senate Romney might be the only Republican to vote "guilty" and they could lose Manchin. The Democrats think that if they can keep reminding people in the general election that Trump was impeached, it will damage him...but such a travesty of the process may hurt them much more.

C-SPAN was showing something on impeachment from April 2018 last night. A young man, I forget his name, had written a book on impeachment. He was clearly anti-Trump and was probably expecting Mueller to deliver the goods, but one of his arguments is that impeachment has to have bipartisan support to be considered legitimate. That is lost on the Democrats in Congress.

[bgill]

Both the demonrats and the GOP can’t have an outsider come and uncover their graft against the taxpayers.

[MayflowerMadam]

“If the Democrats by some chance (i.e. corruption) beats Trump, there will be a CWII.”

All of us have said that at one time or another. But how could/would that happen? Not being critical; I’m seriously wondering.

[Luke21]

Amazing how often they throw those Watergate terms around.

[Albion Wilde]

bump

[tired&retired]

It would start with a stock market correction. A big one.

That would be followed by increased tension between people in the cities and police.

That would be followed by mass exodus from the metro areas.

Followed by a shutdown of transportation in/out of cities including food shipments.

CWII will be metro vs rural.

Look at Mexico now. That is a beginning where the drug cartels have so much power that the Mexican government doesn’t want to deal with them. The residents must leave or form military compounds.

[1Old Pro]

The Dims’ strategy is “death from a thousand cuts.” Hence the constant drip-drip-drip of small, sharp stabs.

It works well with suburban women.

[ought-six]

“It works well with suburban women.”

Ain’t that the truth! It is one of the reasons I am opposed to women in combat: They are by nature maternal, and will generally fight like hell if their cubs are directly threatened; but in an abstraction such as a war, they would be a liability in a combat role. But, I’m a geezer, so what do I know?