[dp0622]

I’m not informed enough to know.

Is 20 to 35 percent saying their financial situation has improved a lot?

It seems like a low number to me but the writer is saying they are good numbers.

I’ve not a clue. If someone does, please fill me in and thanks ahead of time.

[Vigilanteman]

It is obvious to anyone with more than a handful of functioning brain cells that the Trump economy is awesome. What I don't understand is why this election is even competitive. Can we really have that many people out there who prefer a government handout to a REAL pay check?

Yeah, I know I can't see it because I spend most of my days with real people with real jobs.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

An ill known predictive measure of government is simple. Called “government efficiency”, it is just the ratio of what a government promises vs. what it delivers.

But it, as much as anything else, determines whether any given government succeeds or fails.

Promise a little and deliver, that government will remain.
Promise a middling number and deliver on most of it, they will have middling support from the public.

But promise a lot and fail to deliver, and that government is on the way out.

Importantly, it matters far less the form of government, or if the people even want what is being promised. All that matters is delivering on promises.

This means that President Trump’s reelection campaign should be based on what promises he has delivered. This will give him the best success.

[EnglishOnly]

GO TRUMP GO!

[Buckeye McFrog]

The only possible way that the Democrats could beat Trump is to come up with a platform that the voters like BETTER than Trump’s.

Which they can’t even attempt to do because Schiff and Pelosi have made it all about impeachment.