“It’s a shame that they will be supporting perversion”
FALSE.
Read the article - and I’d tell all posters here to read.
They are not SUPPORTING homos; they’re just not contributing to something that could be seen as “anti-homo”.
Wrong. They are submitting to homosexual activism. That is most definitely “supporting homosexuality”.
“could be seen as anti-homo”
Like Salvation Army.
To hear the Left tell it now, if you liked Walt Disney’s pre-1980s feature length cartoons, you are a racist.
I don’t let the Left define what “is” or “isn’t”.
They don’t even know how to tell a boy from a girl.
“They are not SUPPORTING homos; they’re just not contributing to something that could be seen as “anti-homo”.”
No difference. To homos, anything not pro-homo is anti-homo.
They are not SUPPORTING homos; they’re just not contributing to something that could be seen as “anti-homo
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
What pathetic drivel.
Revelation 3:16-18
16 So I will spit you out of my mouth, because you are only warm and not hot or cold.
“...But after years of “taking it on the chin,” as a Chick-fil-A executive told Bisnow, the latest round of headlines was impossible to ignore. This time, it was impeding the company’s growth...”
Yes, they are supporting the perverted efforts of the LBGT mafia by caving into their demands and changing the organizations they have been donating to in the past because of the strong armed tactics of these radicals. Furthermore, they are encouraging that group to attack any company who doesn't agree with their agenda in the future knowing their bullying tactics work.