Posted on 11/18/2019 10:15:01 AM PST by gwjack
Doesn’t matter, if he released his returns the Dems WILL find something, perhaps he didn’t “give” enough to charity (the horror) to Trump using “loopholes” to reduce his tax burden. SOMETHING will be found.
People who have no clue about business. Business financials tell you a lot more than tax returns. Granted, I don’t know at Trumps level but I suspect if you were looking for a lone they’d rather have your financials than your taxes
Rubbish, you can’t tell how much someone is worth via tax returns. If you want to know how much he’s worth look at his financials over the course of all his life for all his businesses. That still probably wouldn’t tell you
hussein made it into one.
Supreme Court Justices do not pay any income tax, at least not on their salaries from the court... :)
Thanks gwjack. Equal protection clause ping.
Hey, DemonRats, how about we examine your bank records and tax returns nice and close, too? Be careful what you wish for.
What is your source for saying the Supremes don’t pay any federal income taxes?
They most certainly do.
That ship sailed a looooong time ago.
Mornin’
It hhe witches are gone, there is no requirement for a witch hunt
yeah i get that - was wondering how it related to the thread
The Left will say nasty things about Trump whether he releases the tax returns or not. But with them in the public domain at least he can point to a piece of hard evidence (the tax returns) to refute the Left’s claims. Having some evidence in your favor is better than having none.
They want the names of everybody he has done business with or made donations to in order to dox them and make their lives miserable or put them out of business altogether. That’s what/who he’s protecting.
Perhaps, but in context of the “impeachment” hearings, the left will take anything and RINO’s would jump on-board with dems and say; “See? See? I told you he did X-Y-Z. . .”
Look here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3795927/posts
“The DOJ in a brief filed Friday called on the Supreme Court to hear Trump’s appeal to block a subpoena from Manhattan prosecutors who are demanding that his accounting firm release eight years of his financial records,”
I bet that the error by CNBC was intentional.
That is glaring error. And they were not even called out for it. There is big difference between Congress, and Manhattan. But “Congress” sounds so much more serious to the sheeple.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.