Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Supreme Court To Decide Whether Gun Owners Can Drink At Home
Bearin Arms News ^ | 11/18/2019 | Tom Knighton

Posted on 11/19/2019 4:52:27 AM PST by Lowell1775

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Lowell1775

Where in the Constitution does it say “... the right to keep and bear arms, but only while sober...”


21 posted on 11/19/2019 6:22:05 AM PST by BuffaloJack ("Security does not exist in nature. Everything has risk." Henry Savage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser; Saltmeat
Dirty cops have been known to drop illegal narcotics in a car or home to increase charges. See the case in Houston as an example.

What's to stop a cop from dropping a beer can (or a case) into a house where he wants to confiscate guns?

Or into an ex-girlfriend's new dude?

Or a malicious ex-wife and her divorce attorney doing that?

The prosecutors in OH misapplied the law.

22 posted on 11/19/2019 6:22:37 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

How about meth or other illegal drugs? How about cough medicine? How about tripping hazards as your walking around with the gun? Maybe pass a law against carrying it while sneezing or hiccuping or laughing because you might drop it causing it to go off or one in a billion chance of pulling the trigger during a sneeze.


23 posted on 11/19/2019 6:23:37 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

I agree.


24 posted on 11/19/2019 6:31:28 AM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

An incorrect ruling here would create two classes of people under the law. Muslims and Mormons vs. just about everybody else.


25 posted on 11/19/2019 6:33:57 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

Well since they’ve outlawed homeowners the right to shoot rats in their basement it’s no surprise. Will that also apply to street gangs? Oh, maybe not since they’re unable to control them.


26 posted on 11/19/2019 7:00:25 AM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

Whatever they decide doesn’t matter.

It’s still better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.


27 posted on 11/19/2019 7:04:49 AM PST by Alas Babylon! (The prisons donÂ’t fill themselves. Get moving, Barr!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Why do the media never say that the guns used in a crime are non-registered illegal guns?


28 posted on 11/19/2019 7:06:00 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

prohibiting gun owners from carrying firearms while intoxicated should be applied inside a gun owner’s home.
= = =

Next we will hear that just the possession and handling of firearms intoxicates the owner (with power).

And that intoxication is illegal.


29 posted on 11/19/2019 7:21:46 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

“So, if there is to be war, go first for the prosecutors.”

All of officialdom is at risk.

They will be forced into dedicated enclaves after they watch the hangings of journalists and professors.


30 posted on 11/19/2019 7:30:25 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775
In truth, prohibition was a complete and total disaster.

That is untrue.

On balance, it was probably unwise and repeal was, on balance, in the public interest.

But it was sold as a public health and safety measure, and on those grounds, both in terms of hospital admissions for alcohol poisoning and liver disease, as well as domestic violence incidents, prohibition was a great success.

31 posted on 11/19/2019 7:34:34 AM PST by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Prohibition made a lot of normal people into criminals. It made a lot of criminals into very bad criminals. And it created a massive Federal bureaucracy to prosecute alcohol which is still with us to this day and is completely out of control. BATF


32 posted on 11/19/2019 9:36:43 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Probation is also thought to have played a part in bringing on the Great Depression. It decimated a large number of jobs in the transportation industry and jobs in the liquor industry and those job losses had a snowball effect.

The amount of unemployment created by prohibition is something that rarely gets mentioned yet it was very significant.


33 posted on 11/19/2019 9:40:06 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Saltmeat
The Constitution says nothing about who can drive.

That's because the people who wrote the Constitution had no idea that anyone would ever be dumb enough to claim that the common law right to travel was somehow a 'privilege' that could be revoked by the state at will. I wouldn't have ever believed it either.

34 posted on 11/19/2019 10:23:54 AM PST by zeugma (I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

However, if you’re driving home with those same unopened containers and grandma t-bones you, it’s now considered an “alcohol-involved” accident, even though both you and grandma are both sober. You likely won’t be charged with anything, but it WILL be used to pad the statistics, which will be used to tighten the laws even further.

Same slippery slope. You have noticed that the BAC level for what is considered “impaired” has been dropping over the last decade, haven’t you?

I won’t belabor you, but in Canada, Trudeau got a law passed that makes it that you can be charged for impaired driving even if you’ve been home for up to 2 hours. Really.

It’s the same mindset: make criminals out of everyone not a member of the elite. Lavrenty Beria was their visionary.


35 posted on 11/20/2019 1:38:44 AM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
"Or an anti gun neighbor walks by the gun owner’s trash barrels on trash day, throws a few empty beer bottles next to the empty ammo boxes and calls police."

"That would be a bit tricky to do, but I suppose if you want someone bad enough, and are sinister enough, you can find ways to get cops to do your bidding. It is a highly unlikely hypothetical, however."

Actually, that doesn't seem unlikely at all. With the current harassment and attacks on conservatives in restaurants, stores and HOA conflicts, a neighbor setting up another seems all too plausible.

36 posted on 11/24/2019 4:44:19 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson