Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Eh? Did he convert to islam?
2 posted on
11/19/2019 12:54:59 PM PST by
null and void
(Convicted spies are shot, traitors are hanged, saboteurs are subject to summary execution...)
To: SeekAndFind
Good news for JA.
Keep him safe and bring him to the US to lay out the truth about the Seth Rich murder.
3 posted on
11/19/2019 12:55:03 PM PST by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: SeekAndFind
So what ,he’s crazier than a bag of Democrats now
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
He was being held until we could coordinate his extradition with the release of the FISA report.
Sounds good, anyway...
8 posted on
11/19/2019 12:59:16 PM PST by
Yo-Yo
( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: SeekAndFind
For those who haven't been following this case, here are some key details:
The two Swedish women who accuse WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange of sexual misconduct were at first not seeking to bring charges against him. They just wanted to track him down and persuade him to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases, according to several people in contact with his entourage at the time. . .The women went to the police together after they failed to persuade Assange to go to a doctor after separate sexual encounters with him in August, according to these people, who include former close associates of Assange who have since fallen out with him. . .The Swedish investigation has undergone head-spinning twists and turns. After initially issuing a warrant for Assanges arrest on rape and molestation charges in mid-August, a Swedish prosecutor dropped the rape charge the next day. After this U-turn, it appeared likely that the whole investigation of the 39-year-old Australian computer hacker would be abandoned. Assanges accusers then hired a lawyer who declared he would press prosecutors not only to keep the investigation going but to reinstate rape charges. The case was soon transferred to one of Swedens three Directors of Public Prosecutions, Marianne Ny, who indeed decided to reinstate the rape investigation and continue the molestation probe. She ordered that Assange should be subject to official interrogation about the allegations. . .The most serious accusation Swedish prosecutors made against him in a statement on their website is that he committed 'rape, less serious crime' the least serious of three levels of rape charges that are on the statute books in Sweden. Conviction carries a maximum four year jail sentence and a minimum of less than two years, depending upon the circumstances. . .People who were in contact with both Assange and other members of his entourage at the time say that the woman at some point invited him to stay at her residence. According to the accounts of Assanges associates, his overnight stays at his erstwhile spokeswomans residence soon evolved into a sexual relationship between the two. During one of their encounters, the woman later said, a condom Assange was wearing broke or split. . .That night, according to the accounts of both the newspaper and people who were in contact with Assange and his inner circle, he and Miss W had sex using a condom. The next morning, however, under circumstances which remain deeply murky, the sources said, Assange allegedly had sex with the woman again, this time without a condom. Then, after a meal during which the Mail says that the woman joked that she could be pregnant, they parted on friendly terms, with Miss W buying Assange his train ticket back to Stockholm. Two people who were in contact with Assanges entourage before, during and after these events said that while some details are still unclear, it appears that after parting from Assange, Miss W became increasingly concerned that he might have given her a sexually-transmitted disease. . .:
Special Report: STD fears sparked case against WikiLeaks boss
9 posted on
11/19/2019 1:03:23 PM PST by
Fedora
To: SeekAndFind
It’s good to know that Julian Assange didn’t rape Sweden.
10 posted on
11/19/2019 1:05:01 PM PST by
Eleutheria5
(If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: SeekAndFind
The rape charges were bogus and just a pretext to bring down a guy who was stirring the pot too much. Now that he’s been taken down, those rape charges serve no purpose and suddenly aren’t needed anymore.
12 posted on
11/19/2019 1:10:13 PM PST by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: SeekAndFind
The entire rape thing was a Frameup to begin with. The proof is out there. Our own intelligence agencies set up a fake online dating service which they used in the creation of the false charges. Anons even proved that introduction videos from the site were done by Intelligence operatives who appeared in the videos as potential dates. The name of the intelligence agency is not hard to guess.
When the evidence piled up that Julian had been framed in this manor then the charges were suddenly dropped so that the evidence would never come out in a court of law. The dropping of the charges actually happened a long time ago While Julian was still at the embassy. Why it is being presented as something recent is beyond me. But I see this often in the fake news media.
15 posted on
11/19/2019 1:13:17 PM PST by
Revel
To: SeekAndFind
Hm, coincidental to the announcement that the DOJ IG report is due to be released. Remember that Assange’s arrest was coincidental to the Mueller report release. It’s hard not to think that there’s a lot more going on behind-the-scenes with Assange and the (ongoing) coup attempt by the Deep State.
Assange has no love for Hillary. He blames her for the rape allegations (thinks they were retaliation for Wikileak’s 2010 release of U.S. State Department “cables”).
17 posted on
11/19/2019 1:18:55 PM PST by
Prolixus
(In all seriousness:)
To: SeekAndFind
Seems like these were conveniently ginned up when everyone was initially out to get him and Wikileaks. No surprise they have been finally dropped.
Not supporting him, but never figured out how the US had or has claim to him since he is a foreign citizen, acting outside the US, and is simply publishing information he receives. Where is our jurisdiction?
18 posted on
11/19/2019 1:20:05 PM PST by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
To: SeekAndFind
“the evidence has weakened considerably”
Translation: everyone knows by now the woman lied.
To: SeekAndFind
With what is Assange charged in the USA?
Did not his work take place during the Obama administration and nowdays, the Hillary email stuff is beneficial to the USA.
How can it be proved who actually did the hacking? In fact there is no proof that Seth Rich is not the source who took it and delivered it to wiki leaks.
Extradition may infact save the man’s life from Arkancide
21 posted on
11/19/2019 1:49:09 PM PST by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: SeekAndFind
His resemblance to David Letterman is amazing.
To: SeekAndFind
He helped expose the Hillary Clinton corruption shortly before the election. He deserves a medal for that alone.
30 posted on
11/19/2019 3:04:05 PM PST by
Cedar
To: SeekAndFind
“Julian Assange didn’t kill himself”
34 posted on
11/19/2019 3:11:23 PM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: SeekAndFind
Im guessing British intelligence got what they wanted out of him.
To: SeekAndFind
50 posted on
11/19/2019 4:44:26 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democrats only believe in democracy when they win the election.)
To: SeekAndFind
I would probably get static for this here.
Name Assange as a material witness against the Deep State.
Assign him a GS-13 minimum. If Barr can be trusted, he reports to Barr.
Have him under armed protective custody at either Andrews, Fort Belvoir, or Quantico. Protection would be special operators.
Watch the Democrats crap their pants.
Pass the popcorn.
56 posted on
11/19/2019 8:26:03 PM PST by
Fred Hayek
(The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
To: SeekAndFind
60 posted on
11/19/2019 11:20:05 PM PST by
wardaddy
(I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson