Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US and South Korea break off defense cost talks amid backlash over Trump demand
Reuters via CNBC ^ | November 19th, 2019 | Unattributed

Posted on 11/19/2019 7:04:41 PM PST by Mariner

South Korean and U.S. officials broke off talks on Tuesday aimed at settling the cost burden for Seoul of hosting the U.S. military, South Korea’s Foreign Ministry said, amid a public backlash over a U.S. demand for a sharp increase in the bill.

Officials had resumed a planned two-day negotiation on Monday, trying to narrow a $4 billion gap in what they believe South Korea should contribute for the cost of stationing U.S. troops in the country for next year.

“Our position is that it should be within the mutually acceptable Special Measures Agreement (SMA) framework that has been agreed upon by South Korea and the U.S. for the past 28 years,” South Korea’s Foreign Ministry said, referring to the cost-sharing deal’s official name.

“The U.S. believes that the share of defense spending should be increased significantly by creating a new category,” the ministry said in a statement.

Negotiators left the table after only about one hour of discussions while the talks were scheduled throughout the day, South Korean media reported, citing unnamed foreign ministry officials.

South Korean lawmakers have said U.S. officials had demanded up to $5 billion a year, more than five times the 1.04 trillion won ($896 million) Seoul agreed to pay this year for hosting the 28,500 troops.

U.S. officials have not publicly confirmed the number, but Trump has previously said the U.S. military presence in and around South Korea was ”$5 billion worth of protection”.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; japan; korea; maga; pyongyang; republicofkorea; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Our real costs far exceed $5bil per year. Not to mention the cost of ensuring the free flow of commerce/oil in the Pacific.

The is great risk to the US.

Additionally, yesterday Seoul signed a defense cooperation agreement with China.

I say we start an immediate withdraw of all US forces. Bring the families out first. Everyone, everything out by the end of 2020.

Make it real.

1 posted on 11/19/2019 7:04:41 PM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Bring them all home.


2 posted on 11/19/2019 7:12:49 PM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

That might change if and when there is a change in Seoul’s leaders.


3 posted on 11/19/2019 7:25:22 PM PST by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L,J,Keslin posting here for the record hoping some might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Time to pull out of South Korea - the ROK armed forces can defend themselves....


4 posted on 11/19/2019 7:26:15 PM PST by sheehan (DEPORT ALL ILLEGALS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"Additionally, yesterday Seoul signed a defense cooperation agreement with China."

Nice. I bet the bulk of U.S. casualties in the Korean War were caused by Chicom troops.

5 posted on 11/19/2019 7:32:10 PM PST by Flag_This (Liberals are locusts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

That alone is damn good reason to pull everything and everyone out.

My dad took two Chinese bullets before he came home.

And it’s Seoul just trying to show us who is boss.

Eff ‘em.


6 posted on 11/19/2019 7:34:35 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Pull out the 28,500 U.S. troops and re-deploy them to the U.S. - Mexican border.


7 posted on 11/19/2019 7:35:16 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (I'm triggered by liberals and other assorted moonbats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

“Pull out the 28,500 U.S. troops and re-deploy them to the U.S. - Mexican border.”

Like button please


8 posted on 11/19/2019 7:43:50 PM PST by Fai Mao (There is no rule of law in the US until The PIAPS is executed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

How would Japan react? They may end up paying more.


9 posted on 11/19/2019 7:56:05 PM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Bring them home and do the same in Japan.

Then leave NATO and come home from Europe too.


10 posted on 11/19/2019 8:05:04 PM PST by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I say we start an immediate withdraw of all US forces AND build another aircraft carrier.


11 posted on 11/19/2019 8:08:32 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (BLACK LIVES MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farcesensitive

Let Japan re-arm themselves. I’ll bet SK would love that.


12 posted on 11/19/2019 8:09:37 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (BLACK LIVES MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

“I’ll bet SK would love that.”

China too.


13 posted on 11/19/2019 8:10:44 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“US and South Korea break off defense cost talks amid backlash over Trump demand”

fine, SK. Break off the talks all you want but you no payee, we no stayee ...


14 posted on 11/19/2019 8:51:17 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

We will be keeping those armed forces somewhere. Might just as well be there.

While I understand where you are coming from, we had peace in that region for decades in part because the U. S. made it crystal clear what the cost would be if there wasn’t.

As for South Korea signing a defense cooperation agreement with China, I’d take that with a grain of salt.

South Korea knows China all to well. It may be a defensive move, just pretending to have good agreement, when it comes to China.


15 posted on 11/19/2019 11:38:11 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“We will be keeping those armed forces somewhere. Might just as well be there.”


It might as well be at home.
It costs more to keep them there (directly and because the money spent doesn’t go back into the US economy) and we risk a war that we don’t need and isn’t in our interests.

We will need the troops on the Mexican border all too soon as Mexico turns into a communist dictatorship and/or a cartel anarchy.


16 posted on 11/19/2019 11:47:31 PM PST by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

These people really are Seouless...


17 posted on 11/19/2019 11:58:10 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farcesensitive

Yeah we don’t need troops in the Middle East. We don’t need them in Germany. We don’t need them in Korea. We don’t need them anywhere else.

So when we bring all those guys back home, what do you think happens to them in less than 18 months?

They will be cut loose to save money.

Our armed forces drops precipitously as a result.

China, Russia, line up nations they want relations with, and then place a few troops there, sign up port agreements. Move a major presence there.

We have pulled out, have no more contact with people on the ground there. Our bases are closed. Our relations that would allow us back, are decayed and gone.

What you prescribe without realizing it is the surest fire way I know of the become the Britain of the 21st Century.

Hey, you’re not alone. A lot of folks have this all figured out, just how to make the U. S. stronger.

It will have the exact opposite effect.

Then places we used to be will flare up. Hey, we won’t be there. Who cares?

When Europe, the Middle East, the South West Pacific are all on fire, and we’re content at home here, how long will that last?

The last step in your great plans, will wind up being the U. S. having to fight foreign powers on it’s own soil.

We either keep our presence in the world, or withdraw from it.

Not a well thought out plan.


18 posted on 11/19/2019 11:58:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Britain hollowed itself out supporting an empire it couldn’t afford and the same thing is happening to us.

And we will end up having to fight foreign powers on our own soil but be unable to afford it with your plan.

There is no reason we can’t rapidly expand our military in the event of an emergency or keep a a lot of it even if it is stationed here at home.

We also don’t need to keep all of those forces overseas to have relations with foreign countries and if Russia or China expand their foreign presence it will only help to bankrupt them.


19 posted on 11/20/2019 12:12:51 AM PST by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Farcesensitive

Over 70% of adults between the ages of 18-25 are not eligible to serve due to weight, low test scores, etc. Much of the other 30% think we’re a racist hellhole and would probably actively assist anyone who would invade us because in their minds we’re evil/racist/whatever and deserve destruction. If our military were to rapidly decline due to budgetary issues, we would be very hard-pressed to fill enough uniforms in an emergency.


20 posted on 11/20/2019 12:36:06 AM PST by This_Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson