If you are unemployed in this economy, go look in the mirror.
The problem will be staring back at you.
/#obviousSARCASM
Didn’t we solve “hunger” problems with food stamps in the ‘60s?
I also question, these Democrats, that if “hunger” is such a persistent problem, why didn’t their icon, Obama, resolve that problem during his 8 years as president?
Nothing is free. Will hospitals, farms, and schools run without money?
Sure. If you do that, the recipients will demand more and refuse to work, leading them to have less food, and to demand more free food, which will cause them to become lazy and work less, leading them to ..... (repeat until doomsday.)
Socialist tyrants love hunger. Food distribution is a very useful tool for control.
Yup - Leftist priority: make everybody hungry(except of course the ruling elite). Make everyone think only the government can feed them. Make them completely dependent on government.
If any of the current crop of "Democrat" candidates win the Presidency, especially with a Congress dominated by the AOC wing, Castro's message may become a reality, just not in the way he is saying it.
Nope, the fattest people in all human history. No need for “poor.”
It is never about real issues with these bastards
It must be working, cuz I’m hungry.
Sloppy headline. Should’ve said something like, “Alleviating Hunger”
Seriously, I have no idea how big a problem hunger is, but I watch a lot of cooking shows where the winners win a donation for their preferred charities, and No Kids Hungry is the one chosen most.
A government that feeds you also can starve you. Just saying.
He means that literally though.
Socialism means hunger is on top of everyone’s minds.
About the only hungry people are stoners with the munchies.
There is no hunger in the US, just look at all the piles of crap in our cities.
Vote for Democrats and plan on being hungry and eating out of dumpsters. Unless if course you are are a member of the elite.
the national priority should be increasing and accelerating the rate of deportations of illegals...
Hmm. It would appear the Dems are done rehashing their ‘60s BS and going back to the ‘30s.
Even if they were 100% lazy and worthless, the safety nets would keep then from starving. Now if they're selling/trading their stipends for drugs, alcohol or sex, it's possible but there's not a dam% thing we can do about that nor should we.
The idea that the US has a hunger problem is ludicrous on its face.
If parents can’t provide breakfast or lunch for their kids, should I assume that the parents aren’t eating either? If college students need food stamps, shouldn’t they reconsider college until they can at least provide basic sustenance ? Inquiring minds want to know.