Bring it.
vulnerable GOP senators may be reluctant to support a controversial Trump pick.
Controversial to who? The liberals? The liberals who create scenarios and trumped up charges of sexual assault? The liberals who lead us to believe, that a decades long career in the law meant nothing, and that the only thing that mattered was what happened when two teenagers rolled around on a bed for about 30 seconds 36 years previously? Trumped up controversies will dissuade Republicans from supporting a judicial nominee????
This will be THE subject and THE campaign slogan for the Deeper/Demos. HE’S IMPEACHED! (Except they may not have the votes, they certainly don’t have the crime!)
This is what the impeachment inquisition is all about. If Trump is able to swing the Supreme Court over to 5 solid constitutionalists, it will fundamentally change the US. Unborn babies may be declared to be persons with rights, many gun control laws will be turned over, and many other decisions.
They had better grow some backbone pronto. We will not tolerate weaklings and Romneys (I guess I can use it as a noun). There are only so many publishers willing to take instant remainder memoirs of losers who beg to be on leftist TV panels and say "I hated Trump" and "the whole White House was in chaos because of him."
Even the low IQ CNN viewers get bored and say "what else can you show me?"
There's a good chance the person elected in 2020 will pick his replacement.
As much as liberals love RBG, many are still angry with her for not stepping down in 2014 when Obama and a Democrat Senate could've picked her replacement.
I don't want to see a repeat of this mistake.
If Ginsburg codes dead before November, Trump would be wise to defer nomination until after the poll. He likely has a single page in a old folder that will handle this contingency better than anything I got.
Today I was in a CVS to pick up a prescription for my wife. While I was there, I heard a medical news report on pancreatic cancer. I learned the two-year survival rate is about 7 percent.
I suspect Joan Ruth Ginsburg’s tenure on the SCOTUS is rapidly coming to an end.
Bogus charges and a bogus trial, all set up for political purposes--nothing else! "Guilt by accusation" carries no weight.
If the President gets nothing else done and is voted out, these appointees have changed the course of the next 10 years or more. Now on to the most over-turned and liberal Appeals District - the 9th. Hope there are some openings in the next year.
Having metastatic pancreatic cancer complicated by sepsis isn’t a “health scare”
It’s a terminal Illness.
Who is it scary for? Not me. I call it a tease.
Kim Clement’s prophecy if true was that two would step down during Trump’s Presidency.
Scalia didn’t step down. He died. And before Trump took office.
Kennedy stepped down.
If Ginsburg dies, rather than steps down, that may not count.
Meaning Trump could replace her and one more that steps down during his two terms.
No battle about it.
What will the Dems cave on is more like it. Cave on nothing and keep playing these stunts, and the new supreme judge goes in.
I live in Maine. The democrats have no chance of picking up a Senate seat here against Collins.
They’ll try, because of Collins’ support for Kavanaugh, but they will fail.
She’s not going to step down as long as she’s alive.
“... even though he blocked former President Obama’s nominee for most of 2016 after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.”
Barry was a lame duck. Trump isn’t. They conveniently leave out that little detail. Ginsburg is going toes up, and Trump appoints her replacement. We win. Well, at least we slow the slog to the Left for a generation.