Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lisa Page Speaks Out...and Casts Herself as the Victim
townhall.com ^ | 12/2/2019 | Leah Barkoukis

Posted on 12/02/2019 8:08:26 AM PST by rktman

Lisa Page, the former FBI lawyer who had an extramarital affair with ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok and exchanged anti-Trump text messages over fear he'd be elected, announced Sunday she was breaking her silence.

“I’m done being quiet,” she tweeted along with a link to a Daily Beast interview with her, in which she argues she did not commit any crime.

The article comes days before DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz is expected to release a report into possible FBI misconduct.

Page explains that she had finally had enough of staying silent after Trump’s “demeaning fake orgasm” at a Minneapolis rally in October.

Here’s the section of the rally she was referring to. You can decide for yourself whether you think that’s what it was.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coupplotters; fbi; lisapage; seditious; traitors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: rktman

“Trump’s “demeaning fake orgasm” at a Minneapolis rally in October. “

I was at the rally, the fake orgasm was really funny.


21 posted on 12/02/2019 8:30:02 AM PST by READINABLUESTATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Ok, victim, yah, sure and typical. This is a tried am true Lefty technique. When caught doing something illegal, play the victim card and play it hard.

Having said that, I think we are being foolish if we put any stock in the upcoming IG Report being conclusive. I would never expect the Deep State to rat out the Deep State. Horowitz IS Deep State, make no mistake about it.

Will the entire cast of characters be named along with their misdeeds? I am sure of it. I am also sure that the usual or a new “weasel out” will be created in the report:

“No bad intent, they never actually did what they were talking about, the FISA warrants would have issued anyway, Trump’s campaign wasn’t spied on it was “observed heavily,” There were no falsehoods or lies, just misstatements, Comey knew nothing about the particular misstatement that lead to the issuance of the warrants, just about all the other misstatements.”

Lucy and Charlie Brown tick tock tick tick tock talk and more talk.

Republicans go to jail in DC, not democrats.


22 posted on 12/02/2019 8:31:27 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Incredible – FBI Blocking Release of Unredacted Text Messages Between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok…
CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE ^ | 8/21/2019 | SUNDANCE
FR Posted on 8/22/2019, 1:38:28 AM by bitt

… Every minute spent outraged at what Muller did yesterday, is one minute less that Bill Barr is being held accountable for what he is not doing today…
Judicial Watch is fighting for one of the more critical buckets of “declassified documents” from within Spygate that has never made sense. This goes to the heart of a two-year-long contention: Why were the Page/Strzok text messages redacted in the first place? Why are their unredacted text messages being protected? Who benefits from this roadblock?

The FBI wants to wait until AFTER the 2020 election to release the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages? Whiskey – Tango – Foxtrot ! Enough. This alone should be like a million warning flares shooting skyward simultaneously for those who demand justice.

These are critical questions. Actually, long-standing and unresolved questions that we have carried for two years. On December 1st, 2017, the day after Michael Flynn signed a coerced guilty plea, the first batch of text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok became public. Who the hell released them? Why? …and ultimately what national security issue exists that would require them to be redacted?

These are open, non-encrypted, messages – using government phones – between a DOJ lawyer assigned to former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok.

The content did not travel through protected and/or classified systems. So why were the text messages redacted when they were made public?
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com …


23 posted on 12/02/2019 8:31:37 AM PST by Liz (httpsOur side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. conclusive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger; All

Smirky McStrozk used her like a rented mule

Gordy Sondland, Harvey Weinstein. Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Clinton, Hunter Biden, etc., etc.

Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives. - Communist Manifesto pg 32

Even Karl Marx didn’t like these azzhats. He actually referred to this scumbag class as “socialist bourgeois”

These MOFOS are so EVIL, that even the COMMUNISTS DIDN’T LIKE THEM.

2020 Great eyesight...READY - AIM - VOTE


24 posted on 12/02/2019 8:32:24 AM PST by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: deport

It’s the real one that deals with the 302’s that were fraudulently obtained AND altered. She altered one iirc


25 posted on 12/02/2019 8:34:42 AM PST by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
The final Mueller report is more than an exoneration of Trump. It’s a searing indictment of Obama's FBI.......
and a reminder that we, the people, not only need to know ....we demand to know....the sordid details behind
this unprecedented attack on a presidential candidate.

As Rep. Jim Jordan (Repub-OH) said, text messages between Page and Strzok, reveal FBI views of Trump that were more
than just biased, they actually show “animus” toward the president.

The attack on Trump was not individuals acting alone.
The sinister plot was orchestrated by a sitting president with plenty to hide.

The Halfrican desperately needed Hillary to win......to sweep the wrongdoing under the rug. US intel was used for sinister purposes.

REMINDER US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.

26 posted on 12/02/2019 8:34:47 AM PST by Liz (httpsOur side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. conclusive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Key element to all these “responses” desperately released in media... just prior to the release:

Those mentioned/exposed in the IG report are allowed to see this, in the context of their part of the document (not the whole thing), and they are allowed to “comment”.
The COMMENT requires, under the IG laws, for the IG to have a rebuttal (which is known to the malefactor accused, who is possibly referred for indictment in any case). The rebuttal is known to them but not to us regular citizens.

So— it must be desperation bad for Page to “come clean” so to speak (LOL)— because she is a serious loser in all this. the guy she worked with James Baker, was fired and flipped long ago, flipped on her and the entire FISA fake process.
Page is clearly not going to be “let off”.
Neither is Strozk.
Nor is McCabe (he is indicted btw- this point not covered at all in MSM. The decision was made, per court order).

So— Natzi Pelousi and 20 plus democrat operatives FLY to Madrid for a meeting of the Comintern-—oops the global warming-00ps- the climate change—oops now it’s the Climate Crisis. The “Greens” are Reds... communist re-distribution of wealth to “Save the Planet”.

Because they cannot answer for their Stalinist coup against our Constitutional Republic. But. they. will.! Yes, they will!


27 posted on 12/02/2019 8:35:37 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Here’s What Lisa Page Had to Say About That FBI ‘Insurance Policy’
Townhall.com ^ | March 13, 2019 | Katie Pavlich
Fr Posted on 3/13/2019, 1:15:03 PM by Kaslin

Former FBI attorney Lisa Page, who conspired with fired FBI agent Peter Strzok to stop Donald Trump if he won the presidency, testified in front of a closed door session on Capitol Hill last year. Now her testimony has been released, showing the extent to which the duo was willing to go with their efforts. It reveals the “insurance policy” discussed in text messages was likely Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel investigation.

“If he is not elected, then, to the extent that the Russians were colluding with members of his team, we’re still going to investigate that even without him being President, because any time the Russians do anything with a U.S. person, we care, and it’s very serious to us,” Page said about her thinking under questioning from former Congressman Trey Gowdy. “But if he becomes President, that totally changes the game because now he is President of the United States. He’s going to immediately start receiving classified briefings. He’s going to be exposed to the most sensitive secrets imaginable. And if there is somebody on his team who wittingly or unwittingly is working with the Russians, that is super serious.”

Text messages found between Page and Strzok, with whom she was having an affair, discuss a meeting in fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s office to go over an “insurance policy.” A number of other messages showed Strzok and Page repeatedly slamming Trump and his supporters while favoring the election of Hillary Clinton.
Further, her testimony reveals there was no evidence of collusion at the time the Special Counsel investigation was launched in May 2017. Nearly two years later, there is still no evidence.

The newly released transcripts of my interview with Lisa Page indicate that Peter Strzok had no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia prior to the launch of the FBI and special counsel investigations into the matter. pic.twitter.com/Mt8SChdocI— John Ratcliffe (@RepRatcliffe) March 13, 2019

As a reminder, the Department of Justice Inspector General found the anti-Trump messages exchanged between Page and Strzok to be deeply troubling. From a report released in August 2018:

“During the course of the review, the OIG discovered text messages and instant messages between some FBI employees on the investigative team, conducted using FBI mobile devices and computers, that expressed statements of hostility toward then candidate Donald Trump and statements of support for then candidate Clinton,” the report states. “We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.”

“Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, ‘No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it’ in response to her question ‘[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!’, it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice,” the report continues.


28 posted on 12/02/2019 8:37:17 AM PST by Liz (httpsOur side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. conclusive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

It takes enablers in the opposition party to pull off an usurpation.


29 posted on 12/02/2019 8:38:31 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All
Mueller was not hired to investigate Trump; he was hired to cover up crimes, his own and those of his fellow travelers:
the elaborate plot to derail the Trump campaign and when that failed, to orchestrate Trump's impeachment by any means necessary.

==================================

(HAT TIP MAGUA) These are Gestapo tactics under cover of "Special Counsel":

<><>Making Ivanka and Don Jr. rat out their parents.

<><>Sending a Prussian to break down your door at 5 AM with guns drawn.

<><> 80 innocent people on Nadler's list---set to be rounded up like cattle to the slaughter.

======================================

These people are Gestapo thugs. Trump told us.....they are not after the president...... they are after us.

===========================================

Mueller was tasked to cover-up massive crimes by Hillary, the DNC, and Obama and his factotums.Obama created a police state. The US Intel Apparat was commandeered in the spying operation. US intel apparat is there to protect the safety and security of Americans----it is not a political tool. Obama and his team used extraordinary underhanded Third World methods to spy on candidate Trump ....and were fixated on preventing his election.

The game plan changed when Trump was elected. They had to oust Trump using any means possible....real or invented. Explains the goofy, OMG! look on the Halfrican's face when he met Pres-elect Trump.

The dirt Hillary was supposed to sweep under the carpet is now in the capable hands of the man they tried to destroy.

30 posted on 12/02/2019 8:41:55 AM PST by Liz (httpsOur side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. conclusive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
Reading the article in the Daily Beast makes one's blood boil. The misinformation and distortion are overwhelming. What Page and Strzok did to General Flynn should land them in jail for a long time. She admits to editing the 302s for "grammar."

Page is part of the cabal that tried to take down both candidate and President-elect Trump as well as President Trump. If the DOJ fails to bring these people to justice, then the entire Republic is finished.

31 posted on 12/02/2019 8:43:18 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

Important Report: McCabe and Page Text Messages Withheld From Congress by Corrupt DOJ Officials…
The Last Refuge ^ | 22 MARCH 2019 | sundance
FR Posted on 3/23/2019 by E. Pluribus Unum

All day long, even before the Mueller news broke, Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge has really been leaning-forward, giving insight into the pending Inspector General report by OIG Michael Horowitz. Herridge is one of those reporters who is careful not to get out in front of her skis. Ms. Herridge is not a book-selling member of the tick-tock community of pundits.

We noted earlier how the specific emphasis of Ms. Herridge seemed to indicate the Horowitz report was closer to the surface of completion than previously thought.

Immediately after the Mueller news broke (around 5pm EST), Herridge filed her first live report providing details of the Mueller report. Within that first report Herridge stated she was previously bound to “confidences” until the Mueller probe was complete.

In subsequent reporting we begin to see what those confidences are, and how they connect to her exclusive reporting on text messages between Andrew McCabe and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page.

Ms. Herridge is strongly emphasizing a few key points that need additional emphasis:

First, IG Horowitz is looking into the leaking of memos that contain classified information by “Senior FBI Executives”. This bullet-point directly relates to the James Comey memos that were leaked to the New York Times by Comey himself. On this first point, that would mean Comey is under investigation by the DOJ for those leaks.

Second, IG Horowitz is following up on his own investigative finding where he found FBI officials were taking gifts from media. This violates FBI policy and could be a bigger ethical issue depending on the details. Interestingly, connecting this path to bullet-point #1, Herridge says: “by those same Senior Executives.” That would indicate former FBI Director James Comey, and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe would be under investigation for…

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com …


32 posted on 12/02/2019 8:45:53 AM PST by Liz (httpsOur side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. conclusive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Testifying before Congress last March, Lisa Page said if she ‘had it all to do over’
she ‘wouldn’t write all that s*** down’ on the FBI computer to be discovered later

FR POSTED / 3/14/2019, 4:38:27 PM · by SleeperCatcher
The National Sentinel ^ | 3/14/19 | Jon Dougherty

Another indication......this crowd figured Hillary was a shoo-in.

They did whatever they pleased, said whatever evil thoughts came to their feeble minds........broke US laws with abandon.

Hillary would sweep it all under the Oval Office rug.

=============================

American Thinker ^ | 07/20/2018 | Thomas Lifson
Report: Lisa Page revealed under oath that there was no basis for Mueller's appointment
FR Posted on 7/20/2018, 11:35:51 AM by SeekAndFind

The Mueller special counsel investigation was launched to probe charges that the key FBI officials developing evidence in the case thought were baseless. That's a bombshell accusation that appears to have been confirmed by lovebird-turned-songbird Lisa Page, according to John Solomon. It tends to confirm the suspicion that the Mueller probe is a cover-up operation to obscure the criminal use of counterintelligence capabilities to spy on a rival presidential campaign and then sabotage the presidency that resulted.

Earlier reports indicated that Page has been answering questions from the House Judiciary Committee quite frankly and may even have cut a deal selling out her ex-lover over their professional misbehavior (and quite possibly worse) in targeting the campaign and presidency of Donald Trump with the intelligence-gathering tools of the FBI.

John Solomon of The Hill revealed that he has obtained information from sources who heard Page's testimony in two days of sworn depositions behind closed doors that she offered a bombshell confirmation of the meaning of one of the most enigmatic text messages that the public has seen (keep in mind that there are many yet to be released). Writing in The Hill, Solomon explains: [T]here are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read. That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. "There's no big there there," Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign. Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign. (Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com …

33 posted on 12/02/2019 8:48:20 AM PST by Liz (httpsOur side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. conclusive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Captain Compassion

“She’s feeling the heat. I suspect she was mentioned in the IG report.”

Lisa Page didn’t crawl out into the light because she got mention. She will know exactly what was said in the FISA Abuse IG Report and apparently it’s damning.

This is the type of spin put out by professional DC Lawfare types.

She is however correct. She is not guilty of crime. She’s guilty of many crimes and is scared to death.

Expect an announcement of a GoFundMe page for her shortly.


34 posted on 12/02/2019 8:49:29 AM PST by romanesq (8Chan and its child porn, violence and murders are kaput. So is the QAnon grift with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Lisa Page bombshell: FBI couldn’t prove Trump-Russia collusion before Mueller appointment
The Hill ^ | 9/14/2018 | John Solomon
FR Posted on 9/16/2018, 1:38:44 PM by yesthatjallen

To date, Lisa Page’s infamy has been driven mostly by the anti-Donald Trump text messages she exchanged with fellow FBI agent Peter Strzok as the two engaged in an affair while investigating the president for alleged election collusion with Russia.
Yet, when history judges the former FBI lawyer years from now, her most consequential pronouncement may not have been typed on her bureau-issued Samsung smartphone to her colleague and lover.
Rather, it might be eight simple words she uttered behind closed doors during a congressional interview a few weeks ago.

“It’s a reflection of us still not knowing,” Page told Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) when questioned about texts she and Strzok exchanged in May 2017 as Robert Mueller was being named a special prosecutor to take over the Russia investigation.

With that statement, Page acknowledged a momentous fact: After nine months of using some of the most awesome surveillance powers afforded to U.S. intelligence, the FBI still had not made a case connecting Trump or his campaign to Russia’s election meddling.
Page opined further, acknowledging “it still existed in the scope of possibility that there would be literally nothing” to connect Trump and Russia, no matter what Mueller or the FBI did.

“As far as May of 2017, we still couldn’t answer the question,” she said at another point.
I reached out to Page’s lawyer, Amy Jeffress, on Friday. She declined to answer questions about her client’s cooperation with Congress.
It might take a few seconds for the enormity of Page’s statements to sink in. After all, she isn’t just any FBI lawyer. She was a lead on the Russia case when it started in summer 2016, and she helped it transition to Mueller through summer 2017.

For those who might cast doubt on the word of a single FBI lawyer, there’s more.
Shortly after he was fired, ex-FBI Director James Comey told the Senate there was not yet evidence to justify investigating Trump for colluding with Russia. “When I left, we did not have an investigation focused on President Trump,” Comey testified.
And Strzok, the counterintelligence boss and leader of the Russia probe, texted Page in May 2017 that he was reluctant to join Mueller’s probe and leave his senior FBI post because he feared “there’s no big there, there.”

The Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general asked Strzok shortly before he was fired from the FBI what he meant by that text, and he offered a most insightful answer.
Strzok said he wasn’t certain there was a “broad, coordinated effort” to hijack the election and that the evidence of Trump campaign aides talking about getting Hillary Clinton dirt from Russians might have been just a “bunch of opportunists” talking to heighten their importance.
Strzok added that, while he raised the idea of impeachment in some of his texts to Page, “I am, again, was not, am not convinced or certain that it will,” he told the IG.
So, by the words of Comey, Strzok and Page, we now know that the Trump Justice Department — through Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein — unleashed the Mueller special prosecutor probe before the FBI could validate a connection between Trump and Russia.
Which raises the question: If there was no concrete evidence of collusion, why did we need a special prosecutor?
Page’s comments also mean FBI and Justice officials likely leaked a barrage of media stories just before and after Mueller’s appointment that made the evidence of collusion look far stronger than the frontline investigators knew it to be. Text messages show contacts between key FBI and DOJ players and the Washington Post, the Associated Press and the New York Times during the ramp-up to Mueller’s probe.
And that means the news media — perhaps longing to find a new Watergate, to revive sagging fortunes — were far too willing to be manipulated by players in a case that began as a political opposition research project funded by Trump’s Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, and led by a former British intelligence agent, Christopher Steele, who despised Trump.
Finally, Page’s statement signals that the nation’s premier intelligence court may not have been given a complete picture of the evidence — or lack thereof — as it approved an extraordinary surveillance intrusion into an American presidential nominee’s campaign just weeks before Election Day.
There was no fault to the FBI checking whether Trump was compromised by Russia; that is a classic counterintelligence responsibility.
The real fault lies in those leaders who allowed a secret investigation to mushroom into a media maelstrom driven by official leaks that created a story that far exceeded the evidence, and then used that false narrative to set a special prosecutor flying downhill ahead of his skis.
No matter where Mueller ends his probe, it is now clear the actions that preceded his appointment turned justice on its head, imposing the presumption of guilt upon a probe whose own originators had reason to doubt the strength of their evidence.

John Solomon is an award-winning investigative journalist whose work over the years has exposed U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before t


35 posted on 12/02/2019 8:51:40 AM PST by Liz (httpsOur side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. conclusive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Page explains that she had finally had enough of staying silent after Trump’s “demeaning fake orgasm” at a Minneapolis rally in October.
************************************************************

Well for pity’s sake Page, it wasn’t Our President that you had your legs in the air for, I do believe it was some guy named ‘Peter’ something or other, if you can’t remember who you put your legs in the air for and scream like it’s the best sex in the world then your no better than Kamala “legs in the air” Harris...are you two having a contest or what???


36 posted on 12/02/2019 8:51:43 AM PST by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"... "Let The Force be with YOU!!!"... Making America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Threaten this woman with taking away her fredom by providing her with substantial jail time and she'll spill her guts.

She's better than halfway there already.

37 posted on 12/02/2019 8:52:48 AM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Threaten this woman with taking away her freedom by providing her with substantial jail time and she'll spill her guts.

She's better than halfway there already.

38 posted on 12/02/2019 8:53:11 AM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Compassion

Yep. We are watching desperation. I suspect it will ramp up considerably as the week continued to count down.

My prediction is that it will find wrongdoing but nothing worth prosecuting. It’s what we always seem to get.


39 posted on 12/02/2019 8:53:45 AM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
.......a bombshell accusation appears to have been confirmed by FBI lovebird-turned-songbird Lisa Page ....
tends to confirm suspicions that Mueller's is a cover-up scheme to obscure the Obama admin's criminal use
of the US counter-intelligence apparat to spy on a presidential campaign and then sabotage the presidency that resulted......

The Obama police state must be exposed.....the evidence is overwhelming.

PROOF POSITIVE THAT OBAMA KNEW----Obama’s CYA maneuver of January 3, 2017-——the signing of NSA Data-Sharing Order Section 2.3 by AG Lynch —— is the coupe d’etat to blow out The Deep State. Obama’s after-the-fact ex/order contains some unusual language particularly the convoluted language WRT “The Strategic Delay of Section 2.3 of Obama’s Executive Order 12333”:

NOTE WELL: Prior to the formal signing of Section 2.3, greater latitude ALREADY existed within the White House in regards to collection of information – especially in relation to the Trump Campaign. However, once signed, Section 2.3 granted broad latitude to inter-agency sharing of information.

But by the time Obama’s new executive order was signed on January 3, 2017, all that information was already in the possession of Obama White House.

Thus, Susan Rice’s January 20, 2017 email to herself takes on an even greater significance b/c no one was ever supposed to know about the REAL meaning of Obama’s retroactive CYA.....until Rice stupidly laid it all out in an official email.

==================================================

When Susan Rice stupidly wrote a CYA memo to herself, she inadvertently confessed to a series of crimes that added the time line and inferences about what the outgoing Obama administration illegally concealed from incoming President Trump and his aides. CYA memos are rarely a good idea. Most often, they reveal things the author never intended——ala Susan Rice’s now-infamous email to herself.

40 posted on 12/02/2019 8:54:51 AM PST by Liz (httpsOur side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. conclusive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson