and another woman over at Twitter also goes crazy , Hmmm
Looks like collusion.
Are there any FEC laws in regards to this?
It is our company policy that we will run no ads for political purposes that disagree with our Democratic overlords . . .
Maybe now he’ll take the censorship seriously and not just have “pat on the head” social media summits?
After Nov. 2020, Google and Facebook will both face Anti-tust investigations.
As a result they will be broken up into national companies, who must be unlinked one from the other.
This makes them a publisher if they choose to censor content and as such should be legally liable for such behavior. However, Section 230 of the Communications and Decency Act maintains that internet companies can’t be treated as a publisher of the content it allows to be posted on the internet. So even though internet platforms can’t be held legally liable for content, only users of the platform, they still decide to edit and censor the speech of its users. Section 230 gives internet platforms protection from its own users as they can’t be sued for what they don’t publish as well.
It seems to me that there needs to be a provision that allows users the ability to sue these platforms when their free speech rights are infringed.
Removing 300 ads is just the beginning. Soon they will remove ALL references to President Trump.
Unless of course, it’s hateful lies and rhetoric. That will be allowed.
Click my screen name for how Hillary wins next November. With huge amounts of help from Google and Social Media.
First order of business in 2020, BREAK GOOGLE UP
But the report gives no specific reason why the ads were taken down or what company policy they violated.
**************************************************************************************
They were too effective and/or accurately refuted the DemRAT narratives.
This policy must only apply to conservatives. It seems that very other time that I play a music video on Youtube, I have to sit through a Bloomberg ad before it plays—and it’s always one of those short ones that you can’t skip.
Any reporters associated in ANY way, even if any of these companies are former employers, they should be banned from the WH.
Somehow we have to fight back. Our comments are just echo chambers.
What policy? The one they change every hour to suit their needs?
Google’s company policy:
Do Evil.
Sue their a$$es off!
Election interference by Big Tech
Antitrust anyone?
I believe Federal election law requires companies to air ads for a Federal election. They aren't allowed to say "no." They aren't allowed to refuse to run ads approved by a candidate.
bkmk