If anybody in her district or thereabouts can give the scoop on her, I'm all ears.
When it comes to THE most important issue, immigration, she is a Bush League Republican.
Immigration
Stefanik opposed Trump’s 2017 executive order imposing a temporary ban on travel and immigration to the United States by nationals of seven Muslim-majority countries.[55]
Stefanik declined to condemn the Trump administration family separation policy,[56] instead publishing a press release congratulating Trump after he signed an Executive Order to suspend new separations and detain families.[57]
On March 26, 2019, Stefanik was one of fourteen Republicans to vote with all House Democrats to override President Trump’s veto of a measure unwinding the latter’s declaration of a national emergency at the southern border.[58]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elise_Stefanik#Immigration
Honest? Who gives a #### right now!?!?
She’s not running for president. She’s a House member.
And RIGHT NOW the most important thing she can be doing is showing the COURAGE that VERY FEW Rs are showing.
Let HER DISTRICT decide whether she should go or not.
Talk about nitpicking at the WRONG ####ING TIME.
THEY’RE TRYING TO OUST OUR PRESIDENT OUT OF OFFICE!!!
It really won’t ####ing matter what her stance is on immigration if they succeed.
“Ultimately, he believes that “apparent loyalty to the president matters far more than America First.”
Better than the ones who claim to support America first, and slide the knife in Trump’s back every time they get a chance.
She has fought hard in these hearings. This is not a time to go after her like this. Makes me wonder who is behind it. She hurts the Dem cause last week, and now we get this story.
Think about it.
She represents a district in upstate New York that is dying a slow death. It’s a big reason why NY keeps losing House seats after every census. I’m sure that’s a big reason why she’s so accommodating on immigration.
Jose Nino writes for the Mises Institute. They hate tariffs.
Dirty things going on there in DC.
Interesting timing on this hit piece. She must have hit a mark.
There are trolls, misinformed, ill-informed opinionated bobble-heads saying she’s for DACA.
She’s for DACA CLEANUP the same as POTUS is for DACA CLEANUP.
DACA as a program is dead and gone. POTUS killed it. What does that mean?
It means no new DACA applications are being accepted.
The 800,000+ DACA applications previously taken in are under review.
What POTUS and Stefanik are supporting is a humane way of treating adults who were brought here as young children, who are fluent in the language just as you and me, who have no ties to their country of origin. In other words, they look like Americans, they talk like Americans, they are for all intents and purposes Ameicans and it would be a scandal to boot them out to a country they do not know, they don’t speak the language, they would be lost and unsafe in.
That said, there are liars and scammers that applied to DACA and they need to be rooted out.
This is the CLEANUP phase.
Stefanik is for the cleanup. When shes says she wants to address DACA, some knuckledraggers think that means she supports open borders. They are wrong. Don’t listen to them.
Little league politics and mindless political bigots should stop playing Tokyo Rose to the Democrat Fascist Party coup attempt
Stop with the usual mindless drivel and political gutlessness of shooting your own allies in the back 100% of the time. Try actually ONE TIME fighting the Democrat Fascist Noise machine instead of being their willing PR stoodges. It would be refreshing change for your daily political idiocy and mindless political ignronace
We at war. You want to be propaganda bots for the Democrat Fascist party, expect to be treated as such
Je is exactly correct..... Don’t be fooled
Because we must all be in lock step, just like the Democrats.
It’s idiocy such as this that will be the downfall of the country—not just the party.
We should shout this down as forcefully as we shout down Pelosi.
Anyone else notice that this is a Venezuelan telling us the woman fighting hard for Trump isn’t an America firster?
Watch her in action and decide for yourself. Why rely on the opinion of others?
I only wish I could vote for her!
You spend 100% of your time shooting your allies in the back and zero doing anything to fight the Dem.
You are daily an active propaganda agent for Democrat Fascist party black propaganda.
Surprise us ONE time and spend a day FIGHTING the Democrat Fascist Party noise machine not racing around here mindlessly trash talking the GOP for not being ivory soap pure.
Politics is about building coalitions and winning elections. Your sort of mindless dogmatic demand for total ideological purity is one reason why the Libertarian party can’t get over 5% of the vote and server no serious role in US Politics.
You should be careful how you chose your words so people won’t think when you write America First you are referring to anything to do with the vile, scumbag Nick Fuentes.
I strongly suggest being very skeptical of anything being labeled ‘America First’ until you know it has nothing to do with racist, anti semite, maggot Nick Fuentes. I was very surprised and disappointed that Michelle malkin would chose to throw away any credilbility by recently supporting this POS. And Malkin’s name is mentioned on the page when I clicked to it so I presume this article is connected to the America First trolls who will greatly harm the conservative movement if left unchecked. Please watch these clips from Nick Fuentes and his America First ‘sabotage’ podcast if you wonder where I am coming from.
I believe she was upset about Trump pulling out of paris accord , and thinks man is causing climate change-
Yup:
“A New York Republican is speaking out against President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate accord.”
“Stefanik”, eh? Sounds foreign. We need to get a look at this chick’s birth certificate, stat.
Grow up. There is no one in any party that is pure. There are always issues that will bring disagreement. Purity will cause a permanent minority party status.
There are people here on this site who proudly did not vote for their republican candidate in 2018 because they weren't pure. It was an easy call to know that if the House flipped in 2018, Trump would get impeached. A very easy call. Still, that did not move them one bit. I would rather have a person voting with us 75% of the time as opposed to 0%. That however is not good enough - so they will gladly take 0% and impeachment as opposed to voting with Trump most of the time and no impeachment.
The immaturity level astonishes me of those that will take their ball and go home if the republican candidate is not 100% pure.
No party has ever been pure and no party will ever be pure.
I live in her district. I voted for her when she first ran against Bill Owens and was glad that she was elected. Soon after that she became a tool of the establishment. She was voting with John Boehner and his leadership team every time. I wrote to her office and told her that we had not elected her to just be a rubber stamp and that I would not support her again. Since, I have not darkened her circle in the voting booth and will not until I can be sure that she is truly Pro-American. I’m watching her. Her latest performance is promising but, I’ll wait and see.