I don’t disagree with you on that subject.
I am pointing out that there are many causes of mental instability and most of them are not displayed the afflicted as though they are wearing a sandwich board.
Gun free zones offer zero protection from them.
And my point is that they absolutely refuse to even mention that these side effects in “some” patients can cause these deadly mental situations. Or even that it has indeed been a factor in all these mass shootings. It needs to be exposed and addressed so that helpful meds which “do not have” these deadly side effects can be developed rather than “well, it’s as good as we can do and they help most folks, so one now and then are acceptable losses for the better of the whole”. And PROFITS of course...
It’s like a huge pothole in the street they refuse to fix, While it is not physically harming drivers of “cars”, how many “motorcyclists” does that pothole need to kill before the count becomes enough to maybe look at fixing it? What we have is that pothole wrecking the few occasional minority of motorcyclists, but when they wreck they are taking out a bunch of “innocent pedestrians” with them resulting many residual casualties not just the rider of the motorcycle.
This pothole is now also causing a huge residual collateral damage count at that point. Yet we still do not address or acknowledge that the refusal to fix the pothole is the initial problem in the chain of cause and effect.