Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau
"...what judge issued the warrant..."

That's the problem: these congressional committees have their own subpoena power. No judge was involved.

AT&T should have demanded a warrant, signed by a judge. Shame on them.

13 posted on 12/07/2019 6:41:21 AM PST by budj (combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: budj

A boycott of AT&T would be a good start.


38 posted on 12/07/2019 7:24:09 AM PST by cookcounty (Susan Rice: G Gordon Liddy times 10.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: budj
That's the problem: these congressional committees have their own subpoena power. No judge was involved.

AT&T should have demanded a warrant, signed by a judge. Shame on them.

All it takes is an anti-Trump puke at Verizon and AT&T who agrees with the Democrats that Trump should be impeached who will say we can skip the legal department and send out what ever they want, who cares about legal niceties like “Do they have the authority to ask for these data or not? Who are the numbers assigned to, and does it invoke privilege?” That any legal beagle would immediately inquire. Nope, just some low level manager probably got served and caved, gleefully.

68 posted on 12/07/2019 2:23:29 PM PST by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplophobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson