To: caww
Judges and party affiliation makes no sense to me.
A judge interprets the law. Period.
Political affiliation is antitheses to Justice.
3 posted on
12/08/2019 7:15:04 PM PST by
Eddie01
To: Eddie01
5 posted on
12/08/2019 7:20:47 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Eddie01
We all know that is the way it is supposed to work, HOWEVER we also know that unfortunately the courts don’t work without bias!! This is exactly why the SCOTUS picks are so important BECAUSE the judges in ALL courts are biased as HELL!!!
To: Eddie01
Political affiliation is antitheses to Justice.If a judge is a Democrat we know with certainty that they will always 'interpret' the law through the lens of political correctness and social justice. They have zero interest in blind justice. The law of the land has no meaning to them if they can advance their political agenda through the court.
9 posted on
12/08/2019 7:40:10 PM PST by
missnry
(The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
To: Eddie01
Liberals don’t interpret the law. They invent them.
11 posted on
12/08/2019 8:22:43 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
To: Eddie01
You are right. Just grateful that Dems are getting the thorn in their side treatment for a change.
12 posted on
12/08/2019 8:28:36 PM PST by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: Eddie01
And there are no “Obama judges”
15 posted on
12/09/2019 12:31:07 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Recall that unqualified Hillary Clinton sat on the board of Wal-Mart when Bill Clinton was governor)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson