Posted on 12/09/2019 10:41:50 AM PST by janetjanet998
That would make sense to me. Likely there was also some consultation with Barr before doing it, too.
Ok, yes, Wray’s letter came out last week in advance of the report’s release.
Awful.
He’s talking about changing procedures when they ignored mountains of procedures not to mention the ridiculous use of informants who were setting up low level Trump campaign aides in Europe.
SMH
If President Trump can take what they dish out, I think I, who am an optimist by nature, can be happy with how things are going.
I never did like to rush things anyway.
I am patient...like our President.
It will be just fine.
Yeah, since it’s, well, you ;)
IG's can investigate criminal matters committed by employees within their department and they are supposed to send criminal referrals immediately upon finding any possible criminal activity.
Horowitz sent only one criminal referral.
LET’S HOPE IT HAPPENS!
Never happen.
Inducted for sedation has been my highest hope.
More support for your theory:
We will just agree to disagree.
I think you got it right the first time
Yeah, I guess it was a Freudian slip.
That leads to an extensive discussion of very significant "errors" and "omissions." Amazingly, all of these errors and omissions cut in one direction. Horowitz would not want to conclude that the errors and omissions were coordinated or motivated by anything other than the purest of motives.
So: a coin is flipped 17 times, and comes up heads each time.
Bulls-eye.
Durham will surgically examine the results of flipping this two-headed coin and find the coin as bogus as the criminals using it.
The pattern and practice of overt criminal behavior.
No report required from U.S. attorney John Durham--just a set of criminal indictments to bust open the front pages of the world press.
“We will just agree to disagree.”
I wonder who was the last Rat politician to say that. :-)
IG report: full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Those of us who had understood nothing - absolutely zero - would come of it all weren’t surprised.
Tik-tock-blah-blah-blah.
The language used is decidedly not swampish. It sounds more like defiance to me.
“Man Horowitz didn’t even interview Simpson”
Horowitz tried, but he couldn’t compel Simpson to appear.
Simpson unsurprisingly declined the request to be interviewed.
I hate it when people say that just because someone raises a point. What specifically do you disagree with in their post? I actually was not sure what they meant. Happy to have your take.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.