“No, it essentially complements Horowitz conclusions.”
I don’t think so ... He cut him with a very sharp knife, so sharp that people won’t know it till they see the blood.
Durham is (supposedly) running the criminal investigation. So his comments as a prosecutor would need to be especially reserved.
Read Barr’s comments - Barr is the political appointee and has more latitude in what he can say. And this is the money quote, per the NYT: “The inspector general’s report now makes clear that the F.B.I. launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps take.”
IMO, he stops just short of calling them seditious criminal outlaws. If we take everything at face value, if the Justice System were Right and True, it should come down to whether Durham can get the evidence to prove a criminal conspiracy. I know many are skeptical of everyone’s motives. And I know the swamp waters run deep, splashing around too much is going to get mud on allies and enemies alike. I have my opinions on what happened, but try to be reserved about predicting how things will shake out - so we’ll see.