Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: karpov
Inspector Generals are like the human resource arm of a company.

Human resource divisions are not there to help employees but to help the company that they work for.

Human resource departments take care of problems and protect companies!

Inspector Generals can be said to work for the same reasons.

If there’s a way to say that the department didn’t violate the policy or law .. that is what they will do.

Words like bad behavior and errors in judgment are used to describe the actions of rouge, (aka disposable employees) and are not a true representation of the agency itself.

Now that that is out of the way, let's take a look at some reasons for why this report is very limited in scope.

The Inspector General has said that he was looking into the surveillance of a certain person which we now know is Carter Page.

The problem is ... Carter Page was just one of Trump's campaign associates that was spied on.
(One area where Durham and Barr will dig further into)

The Inspector General is inhibited from speaking to anyone not working at the Department of Justice at the time of his questioning.

If they’ve retired or been fired, he can’t force them to cooperate.
(Think: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page Et al)

And let's not forget Kevin Clinesmith!
Clinesmith became infamous for his viva le resistance, (to Trump) while investigating the Clinton email fiasco.

The same Clinesmith who was forced off of the Mueller Trump/Russian 'collusion' investigation after text messages showing his dislike/hatred of Trump were exposed.

If they work at a different agency or department the situation is the same and they can't be forced to cooperate with the investigation.

So now, you have an IG report with a lot of words with very little substance!

If you have followed the Investigation into Trump from the beginning you know that there were numerous 'agencies' with their hand in the Russian Collusion fiasco and most especially ... the Steele Dossier.

The dossier that was paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC.

The dossier was doled out by a number of agencies along with the DOJ and FBI!
(Again, those agencies cannot be compelled to give testimony)

Remember how 'upset' the democrats became when they learned of Bill Barr's appointment as Attorney General?

I believe that they were 'upset' because they had reason to believe that he (Barr) would appoint a Special Prosecutor to head up a real and in-depth investigation, regardless of where it led!
(The Special Prosecutor can compel testimony from outside the agency.)

He did just that!

The Department of Justice has revealed that the probe led by federal prosecutor John Durham has become a criminal investigation due to the wrongdoing it has found.

And Finally ...


How it all began:

========================================

These are but a few of the people that the IG didn't interview.
(If I read the rules of engagement correctly)

I'd say that the report could have looked quite different if they had been interrogated!

Peter Strzok, former deputy chief of counterintelligence
FIRED

Andrew McCabe, former FBI deputy director
FIRED

Lisa Page, former counsel to McCabe
RESIGNED

James Baker, former FBI general counsel
RESIGNED

Bill Priestap, former chief of counterintelligence
RETIRED

James Comey, former FBI director
FIRED

Bruce Ohr, former associate deputy attorney general
REASSIGNED

Christopher Steele, former FBI confidential human source
Steele has never been an FBI employee, but a former British spy
13 posted on 12/09/2019 6:15:46 PM PST by justme4now (Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: justme4now

Thanks


18 posted on 12/09/2019 6:41:15 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson