Did anyone call this hack Horowitz out for his obvious sweeping under the rug?
I thought Horowitz did a very good job. It was factual and accurate. It is not his job to dole out the consequences or punishment.
Check this out =>
____________
Mark Meadows
@RepMarkMeadows
This exchange. Staggering.
Cruz: “A lawyer at the FBI creates fraudulent evidence, alters an email that is in turn used as the basis for a sworn statement to the court that the court relies on. Am I stating that accurately?”
Horowitz: “That’s correct. That’s what occurred”
14:37 - 11 Dec 2019
https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1204847596017205249
He identified 17 instances of FISA abuse but did not identify who was responsible for each. This is a fundamental failure of his investigation.