Her situation is presents us with a really good picture as to how the Left operates, if we care to pay attention (rather than simply bitch about RINOs all day, and not vote out of ‘principle’ in November elections).
In her case, are supposed to believe that the Rohingya people were just a peace-loving community minding their own business in Burma, until the big, bad, military there decided to kick them out. And then Suu Kyi just did a full 180 from being a world-renown humanitarian to the second coming of Hitler to defend them. Right.
...and note that the OTHER SIDE of this issue is never presented, nor even permitted to be discussed.
What disgusts me is how the British , and the BBC , despite ASSK’s long association with the U.K. , her life long marriage to one of their most esteemed professors, Michael Aris , and her two half British sons , they now condemn her and instead take the side of these stateless muslim pretenders to Burma. Absolute pathetic hypocrisy, and repugnant betrayal of honor. There would be no Rohingya problem had not the colonial Brits flushed them there.And now they are typical disingenuous muslim claimants to that which was never theirs ,while demanding rights they never earned or deserved.
What disgusts me is how the British , and the BBC , despite ASSK’s long association with the U.K. , her life long marriage to one of their most esteemed professors, Michael Aris , and her two half British sons , they now condemn her and instead take the side of these stateless muslim pretenders to Burma. Absolute pathetic hypocrisy, and repugnant betrayal of honor. There would be no Rohingya problem had not the colonial Brits flushed them there.And now they are typical disingenuous muslim claimants to that which was never theirs ,while demanding rights they never earned or deserved.