Look, he’s explained it twice. What do you expect a professional to do, say “Even though there was no evidence proving it, I really really think the reason these people went after Trump is because they were biased”.
Let me try. Suppose I have a house to rent and I don’t want to rent to blacks because I’m a bigot. Being smart, I’ll NEVER say anything racist or write anything down or even tell anyone what I think. I’ll just find some other reason, like their credit, to not rent to blacks.
“No documentary or testimonial evidence” means no one copped to it, nothing was found in writing, and nobody ratted them out. That’s what he had to report, not his opinion or theory or guesses.
Get it now?
A judge used Trump’s statements to infer intent. Whore-O-Witz could have done the same thing.
What have you got against black people?