Posted on 12/29/2019 10:21:23 AM PST by SeekAndFind
I think Tulsi Gabbard is an unusual individual who has no chance of becoming President - until after the next Civil War.
The “major” parties are breaking up. Donald Trump blew threw SIXTEEN “acceptable” Republicans like they were made of paper. The similar process for 2020 among Democrats has failed to produce anyone even CLOSE to credible.
The fact is, the two major parties are both in serious decline at the same time - AND their “candidates” are for the most part elderly and NOT really infused with wisdom.
Tulsi is running for the next phase of American politics, if we are lucky enough to return to elections after what’s coming.
Trump will get her to flip. Watch...
Strike 1, 2 and 3.
I’m not sure what her stance is on baby murder. No politics were discussed, she just came to worship God at our Christmas Yves eve service.
Just to clarify.
- Abortion should remain legal and accessible. (Jan 2019)
- I consider myself pro-choice. (Sep 2012)
- Ban anti-abortion limitations on abortion services. (Feb 2014)
- Funding abortion avoids discrimination against poor women. (Jan 2015)
- Constitutional right to terminate pregnancy for health. (May 2015)
- Endorsed by EMILY’s list for pro-choice Democratic women. (Aug 2012)
apparently she’s not running for reelection to the House in Hawaii, so she’s not going to have much of a power base ...
don’t be fooled: tulsi is as “progressive” as any of them; she’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing, wrapping herself in patriotism while plotting the same socialist claptrap the rest are publicly espousing ... in other words, tulsi is an old-fashioned Democrat: a liar who lies about what they really believe and what they would really do if elected ...
“Maybe in 2032. We still have a 2nd or 3rd Trump term, plus 2 terms for Pompeo.”
I seriously doubt Trump will be re-elected . If he IS , he’ll go down in history as the last straight , white , Christian POTUS .
The specific holding in the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the case of U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark was that an individual who is born in the United States to two non-U.S. citizens (i.e., citizens of one or another foreign power) who at the time of such birth are permanent residents of the U.S. is a U.S. citizen pursuant to the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
This may be how your grandparents became citizens.
By the way, did your grandparents parents eventually become U.S. citizens and if so how and when because at that time in the U.S. the citizenship status of minor children may have followed that of their parents.
I’m not fooled by her at all.
As I said... she’s a democrat. Therefore, on the wrong side of everything and anything American.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.