Posted on 12/31/2019 5:18:49 AM PST by karpov
It was a startling claim, published this month by a Harvard sociologist in the journal Science Advances: “Police killings of unarmed blacks substantially decrease the birth weight and gestational age of black infants residing nearby.” That reinforces “the intergenerational transmission of disadvantage,” Joscha Legewie wrote, because preterm birth can affect things like cognitive development.
To reach this finding, he had crunched data on 3.9 million California birth records from 2007 to 2016. In retrospect, though, the results appear oddly specific: There was no ill effect on white or Hispanic infants. No ill effect from police killings of white or Hispanic suspects. No ill effect “for police killings of armed blacks.” If the hypothesis was that nearby police violence raises maternal stress, wouldn’t it show up after any trauma in the neighborhood?
The professor’s explanation was that the trend must be “driven by perceptions of discrimination and structural racism.” White mothers don’t carry that burden. Also, feelings of fear and hopelessness “should be more pronounced for police killings of unarmed victims perceived as unjustified.” There was a nice chart: The effect was strongest when the shooting was within one kilometer of the mother’s home. By about three kilometers, it was statistically insignificant.
A week later the study was retracted. There were errors, for example, in the classification of armed and unarmed suspects. After fixing them, the effect essentially disappeared. It’s a fact of life, alas, that mistakes happen. Journalism is not immune. Mr. Legewie here has been forthright, and we aren’t trying to pile on.
But now that we know the result is illusory, it’s revealing to read how the original finding was greeted like a just-so story. “This is an important finding and a very intuitive one,” a New York University sociologist told the L.A. Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
A prime example of ‘educated beyond intelligence’
They lie. They make up facts and statistics. When caught in the act, they say “Oops”.
These people are just crazy.
I saw that it was written by a Sociologist. Which tells me they just took the outright statistics and probably said A=B and C=D so A=D.
Brainless twit doesn’t even consider areas of high crime might well have high drug abuse by pregnant mothers, resulting in underweight babies, but...the author was a sociologist, after all.
It was a black Marxist racist story to begin with, saying blacks were predispositioned to failure due to stress put on their collective.
Imagine what abortion does to those poor things.
Correspondence is not causation. A similar relationship can be found between impoverished blacks with an eviction within the previous 6 months and police brutality. There might even be evidence.
Read up on Dr. Patrick Frank. The guy has been trying to tell the “climate scientists” that they have been (intentionally?) using the models they “borrowed” from the physicists inappropriately either through incompetence or bad faith for years. They wouldn’t even publish his work.
Well, yeah, not to mention what that whole "gestational age of the infant" suggests.
With this idiot in place we have another reason why “higher” education is a F^^king waste of money. Most majors today would get a better education reading comic books (if they could actually read) than they are getting from these moron so-called Professors.
Will they have to give us taxpayers our money back? HA! Sometimes I say the craziest things.
The original story fit the narrative of the left and was hailed. The correction did not and was not.
You’re a damn liar, Joscha Legewie!
BS and utter drek.
August Weisman cut off the tails of mice for many generations (probabaly in front of them) and not one mouse born after had smaller tails.
Physiological damage can affect existing persons but not ones yet to be born.
Yet these same scientists will happily support abortion of the black race because that’s “good”
The last people to engage in this kind of science were the Nazis. That kind of politics as religion based scientific logic supported things like the vivisection of pregnant Jewish women in Dachau.
These bastards are nascent Nazis, liberal fascists, ready to go to any length to destroy America and substitute the Constitution with their Utopian hell..
Saul ALinsky is their guide.
Right now the Alinskyites want to destroy our police institutions while disarming America at the same time? Virginia is their test ground.
A pox on the lot of them.
A good study of fake news.
Or maybe it was satire
One of N reasons that Harvard is becoming a joke.
STEM excluded, of course. So far, at least.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.