It is difficult to underestimate just how severe a the mullah regime suffered with the death of Soleimani. Historically Islam is at its peak when it has a charismatic, successful, respected military leader at its point. Persia itself was once conquered and converted by such Islamic leaders. The mullahs had their point man with Soleimani who gave critical pride and legitimacy to their rule. He will not be easily replaced. His assassination and loss weakens them. Iranians who yearn for an end to the theocracy see a silver lining in his death.
Yet it would have been interesting if he had lived and his career continued. Was he really the loyal servant of the medieval mullahs or was he an Iranian patriot strongman who eventually saw himself as a revolutionary that would depose the mullahs and reintroduce Iran into the modern world? Might he have become a Pinochet like leader?
Whatever the scenario, it is not in America’s interest to remain entangled in this foreign quagmire. Change and peace in the region must come from within. The Muslims will not embrace Western institutions, practices and values by force of arms. Change will come by exposure to the internet and social media. Through modern communications their people will learn there is a better way to live and will eventually demand it. Also they will sell their oil ( or whatever they have) to anyone with hard cash or they will starve.
“...as a revolutionary that would depose the mullahs and reintroduce Iran into the modern world...”
Gee, that sounds sorta like the Shah.
He was doing an acceptable job bringing Iran into the modern world before A-hole Jimmah Carter enabled A-hole Khomeini to impose the mullahcracy dictatorship on Iran.