Liberals are now hoping he shoots her.
Good for the judge not just being a rubber stamp.
Liberal MSM CBS was right on it. CBS said nothing about the two people who had their weapons confiscated because of the red flag law.
Obligatory picture of guns to trigger the cat ladies.
We’re all brown shirts now.
I wonder if the lady considered learning how to us and carrying a firearm?
The laws are already being abused. In New Jersey, a man sues his doctor, and the doctor turns around and reports him under the red flag law.
Gun control: NJ ‘red flag’ law put to test in case between Middletown man and his doctor
https://www.app.com/story/news/local/public-safety/2019/11/22/gun-control-nj-red-flag-law-tested-case-between-middletown-man-and-doctor/4253289002/
I can guarantee that the “red flag” law gets added to the “silver bullet strategy” in divorce. The divorce attorneys who already falsely accuse a man of spousal and child abuse as part of the divorce to drive him out of the home and limit visitation with the children will be hit with this, too.
No judge in his right mind should act on a heresy statement accusing another of being a danger to himself or others. It is Neo-Nazism pitting neighbor against neighbor.
Judge won’t say why refused. I assume no supporting evidence to enforce it.
I don’t get this law. It’s not going to stop anyone. I have multiple guns and none of them were purchased. There are no records that I have them. So how do they know what to take away?
If the case had been in Denver or Boulder, the guy would’ve had his door busted in, guns confiscated, and his place trashed.
So many false claims of abuse. It’s often how women try to get power.
Someone here at work just told me about this.
The article lies.
“The law allows guns to be taken away from those who present a danger to themselves or others.”
Nope.
It should read, “From those who allegedly present a danger...”
And there’s no repercussions applied to accusers who make false allegations.