[jazusamo]

Good for this sane judge!

[MuttTheHoople]

How many of those “parents” were actually mules?

[fhayek]

What “rights” do you have when you want to bully your way into another country? The right to not have your family separated does not exist in the Constitution or any other document that I am aware of.

[wastedyears]

Good to see some black-robed tyrant cares.

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS

[LjubivojeRadosavljevic]

Well, as an attorney at law, I would say that under the ‘Rights of One’s Children’, the Court Ruled in the Santasky v. Kramer case that the government must prove provide “clear and convincing evidence” before permanently terminating a parent’s rights.

That said, in the aforementioned decision, the Court noted a long standing number of cases had recognized that ‘freedom of rights’. The Court noted this fundamental right falls in the passage of the 14-amendent.

In summary, the Court concluded that ‘before a State can sever completely and irrevocably the rights of parents in their natural child, due process requires that the State support its allegations by at least clear and convincing evidence,.

Did the Trump admiration follow the Courts’ rulings (?)…I am not quite sure, set aside the ACLU not-withstanding. In short, I am sure we will hear more about this matter.

[Does so]

One “negative-DNA-match” child today.