“Reporters could call her a “liberal Republican,” and they should, except that term simply doesn’t exist. (Don’t believe us? Check it out.)”
The article automatically disqualifies itself for intelligence with this statement. I did look it up:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Liberal%20Republican
Definition of Liberal Republican
: a member of a political party of dissident Republicans formed in opposition to the first Grant administration
So much for their opinion when they can’t even be investigative or intelligent about the basics of statements. In other words, they are either reckless with their statements by not caring to cover their statements, or just plain liars with an agenda and hope people like us don’t bother to call them that.
rwood
FReegards rwood!
-—first Grant administration-—
I think you just proved the point with which you seem to take issue. If such a term existed in todays GOP, what exactly would it signify and is there anybody in the GOP to whom the term might apply?