Flowery bloviations often do lead to actions. Would England have stood firm without Churchill’s rhetoric? Would the Union have continued fighting without Lincoln’s? Sometimes powerful rhetoric accomplishes nothing, but without it, nothing ever gets accomplished. We’re in a cold CW2, it’s been said. Very well. I’d rather have the powerful rhetoric than be without it in a CW2, cold or otherwise. The other side can’t even manage humor, let alone rhetoric. Would you rather have Adam Schiff putting fire in your belly? “Forward! Cliff? That’s no cliff! Forwaaaaaaaaaar*splat*!”
>Flowery bloviations often do lead to actions
Presumes facts not in evidence.
>
Would England have stood firm without Churchill’s rhetoric? Would the Union have continued fighting without Lincoln’s? Sometimes powerful rhetoric accomplishes nothing, but without it, nothing ever gets accomplished. We’re in a cold CW2, it’s been said. Very well. I’d rather have the powerful rhetoric than be without it in a CW2, cold or otherwise. The other side can’t even manage humor, let alone rhetoric. Would you rather have Adam Schiff putting fire in your belly? “Forward! Cliff? That’s no cliff! Forwaaaaaaaaaar*splat*!”
>
1) We *might* be in a cold CW I (the War Between the States != Civil War)
2) If it’s the milquetoast @ best (R)N(C) you’re looking to put ‘fire in your belly’, while they stab you in the back & hide under their desks from the MEDIA (they can call ‘em bad names), you’ve lost the war, not just the battle.
Maybe in the next few decades, the (R)N(C) will *FINALLY* getting around to that party platform & eliminate the DoEd, instead of growing it (’small govt’ that they are)
“Forward, voluntary (R) plantation shills! Don’t fire until....well, never, actually!” *rolls eyes*
Next you’ll be telling me to ‘trust the plan’ w/ the 3yrs+ ‘investigation’ into the Deep State...BY the Deep State