[Brian Griffin]

Unless the publicly traded company is run on religion-based principles, I don’t think a religious exemption should apply.

Publicly traded companies run on moral principles and other coverage buyers should be able to refuse to pay for baby-killing drugs such as RU-486.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I'm not sure I'm understanding your point. Are you saying the exemption should be wider whether their objection is religious, moral, or whatever?

Or that it should be narrower, and apply only to proven abortifacient drugs and devices like RU486 and the IUD, and not to contraceptives per se?

I may have misunderstood you.