[McGruff]

Yet there’s a deeper problem. Not only is the Doomsday Clock unscientific; the factors of its setting are now dominated more by policy questions than scientific ones. The former may be important, but claiming the authority of “atomic scientists” is appropriate only for the latter.

[dp0622]

doomsday clock.

Used to be the minutes until my ex girlfriend got home.

[Bob434]

Dang it! now i gotta sell my pearls?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Same science as climate change.

[Bommer]

Time to create a "dumbass clock" for the left. The clock is never wrong, but it ain't just right.

[Fiji Hill]

The Doomsday Clock is ridiculous. It has never been further than 17 minutes to midnight, yet it came into existence 38 million minutes ago.

[Billthedrill]

In Mr. Pinker’s view, the annual announcement is a publicity stunt that demeans the scientific community and makes the world seem more dangerous than it actually is.

Mr. Pinker is correct. I don't know if "successful" properly describes a PR stunt where (1) the clock isn't a clock, (2) the minutes aren't minutes, and (3) the "atomic scientists" are political activists who couldn't tell you the difference between beta decay and a dead cat. And (4) that everybody knows it and has for decades. The word that describes a clock that shows five minutes to twelve for fifty years is "broken".

[McGruff]

[I want the USA back]

A clock is always moving. Like time. It doesn’t stand still.
The doomsday “clock” is not a clock. It is a countdown timer that is NEVER STARTED.

But the name “doomsday clock” precludes critical thinking, and winds up convincing people that it is something to pay attention to.

It’s a political statement. They only advance their “clock” when a Republican is in office. Bammy brought us closer to death by jihad, and the f*****g “clock” didn’t move!

[ZOOKER]

I look at the clock as another "we're all gonna die" anxiety enhancer in an election year.

Used to be the "homeless" showed up every time a republican stood for re-election, only to fade into the background after the election.

That became too obvious, so the dems are reaching back into the Goldwater era - War-mongering Trump is going to blow up the world unless we stop him! It dovetails nicely with the RUSSIA-RUSSIA-RUSSIA theme they ginned up for impeachment.

Can't run on the economy or international trade, and impeachment was a bust. Transgender, abortion, illegal immigration, gun control - the public seems ambivalent or openly opposed to these issues. Nobody believes the lying Dems any more, so trot out the "Concerned Scientists"...

[AnotherUnixGeek]

The clock is a publicity stunt—and a successful one.

Agree on the first point, disagree on the second. I have been hearing news items about the Doomsday Clock since the Reagan era - apparently it's a requirement that this clock move very close to midnight whenever a Republican takes office. No one cares about this nonsense, no one thinks about longer than the few seconds one sees or hears about it. There are more successful ad campaigns running on late night independent TV stations in Wyoming.

[Texas Eagle]

When that damn thing does go off, I’m just gonna hit the snooze button.

[Paladin2]

Who is making money off the Clock?

[edwinland]

Psychologist Steven Pinker argues—and the bulletin admits—that the clock is anything but a scientific instrument.

And what precisely is the counterargument?

[edwinland]

It moved forward in 1953, after the U.S. and the Soviet Union developed the hydrogen bomb, or in 1974, when missiles with multiple warheads became a reality.

Uhm. No it didn't.

People "moved" it.

Also this lame excuse for a Phd doesn't even know the difference between "and" and "or".

[DoughtyOne]

I think the folks who run the nuclear clock, set the clock forward early.

They sprang forward about an hour.

[Pollster1]

the annual announcement is a publicity stunt that demeans the scientific community

As a statistician who once worked extensively with the scientific community, I think this clock is not what should be worrying scientists. Their own conduct, politicizing research, is what demeans the community.

[rbg81]

Anyone who takes this seriously is a moron.