Someone needs to rocket this to Kavanaugh.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: grey_whiskers
Was the ban on mail-in ballots, or third parties collecting mail-in ballots; i.e., ballot harvesting?
To: grey_whiskers
and will likely make it easier for minorities illegal aliens to get their ballots counted in the largely red state
3 posted on
01/28/2020 9:58:35 AM PST by
grobdriver
(BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
To: grey_whiskers
A federal court has ruled Arizona Republicans ban on mail-in ballots is illegal and unconstitutional. So now a voting option that didn't even exist until a decade ago is now a “constitutional right”, got to love the left and their living document constitutional views.
4 posted on
01/28/2020 9:59:19 AM PST by
apillar
To: grey_whiskers
BS!
Mail-in ballots are inherently insecure and prone to fraud.
5 posted on
01/28/2020 9:59:50 AM PST by
Skywise
To: grey_whiskers
Oh my God they are going full steam to turn AZ blue!! What this is saying is that Illegals must be given the right to vote by this ruling!!
To: grey_whiskers
Because minorities are too stupid to know how to vote and mail a letter, and must count on other people to come by, fill in their ballot, and carry it en-mass to the election board? Yup, zero chance to fraud with that process!
The Guardian is a Leftwing rag, and will most definitely misrepresent the facts.
8 posted on
01/28/2020 10:02:43 AM PST by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: grey_whiskers
"A federal court has ruled Arizona Republicans ban on mail-in ballots is illegal and unconstitutional, calling it intentionally discriminatory toward people of color, who already face increased barriers to voting."
What barriers to voting? The court treats "people of color" like children who are unable to follow the rules that apply to everyone else.
To: grey_whiskers
Can’t wait til I’m a minority and can claim all kinds of privileges...
10 posted on
01/28/2020 10:03:30 AM PST by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
To: grey_whiskers
Won’t be long before most of the Demtards in Cali have spread their cancer in NM, Arizona, Texas, etc. Welcome all to your future fate as the new failed California’s....../s
11 posted on
01/28/2020 10:04:23 AM PST by
cranked
To: grey_whiskers
I assume that absentee ballots are still allowed for people out of state on business or too infirm to go to the polls. Or are they?
To: grey_whiskers
To: grey_whiskers
Agree... the State must appeal this sucker immediately.
To: grey_whiskers
... people of color, who already face increased barriers to voting. Name one.
Just one.
20 posted on
01/28/2020 10:47:56 AM PST by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: grey_whiskers; the_Watchman; grobdriver; apillar; Skywise; RoseofTexas; rigelkentaurus; ...
This was a Ninth Circus en banc decision.
"Four of 11 judges on the panel dissented, saying the panel struck down duly enacted policies."
Martha S. Berzon [Clinton judge] replaced Susan P. Graber [Clinton judge].
- Sidney R. Thomas [chief judge] - Rapin Bill judge
- William A. Fletcher - Rapin Bill judge
- Paul J. Watford - ClownBammy judge
- Martha S. Berzon - Rapin Bill judge
- Johnnie B. Rawlinson - Rapin Bill judge
- Mary H. Murguia - ClownBammy judge
- John B. Owens - ClownBammy judge
Dissenting [Arizona law is Constitutional]:
- Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain - Reagan judge
- Jay S. Bybee - Dubya judge
- Richard R. Clifton - Dubya judge
- Consuelo M. Callahan - Dubya judge
TOTALLY "non-partisan" decision, in the Judicial Fantasy World of John Roberts...
21 posted on
01/28/2020 10:52:12 AM PST by
kiryandil
(Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
To: grey_whiskers
25 posted on
01/28/2020 11:02:07 AM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: grey_whiskers
This is the work of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 7-4, along party lines. Yes, it needs to be sent to the Supreme Court. One of the dissenting judges wrote, “It would give people an incentive to figure out where their actual polling place is”. I agree; if someone cannot be bothered to find out where their polling place is, maybe they should forfeit their right to vote. If obeying the law means nothing to them, that’s their tough luck. (Of course, with the new ruling, they need not be responsible NOR law abiding). Pray without ceasing.
"..ban on mail-in ballots.." It is nothing of the sort:
Four years ago, Arizona Republicans made it a felony, punishable by prison time, for third-party groups to collect mail-in ballots during elections a process often called ballot harvesting.
Another 9th Circus temporary ruling that the Supreme Court will have to take the time to reverse.
29 posted on
01/28/2020 11:29:51 AM PST by
Henchster
(Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
To: grey_whiskers
It’s time to reduce the barriers against Peeps of Cullur
They need free taxi rides to go from polling place to polling place. Busses are too slow.
30 posted on
01/28/2020 11:38:51 AM PST by
Gasshog
To: grey_whiskers
32 posted on
01/28/2020 12:01:07 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Q babbleAnon folks are weird.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson